User talk:JRCW

April 2011
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hostyle Clothing, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 14:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hostyle Clothing


The article Hostyle Clothing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable company lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:COMPANY.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hostyle Clothing, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia.  ttonyb (talk) 15:02, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Hostyle Clothing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hostyle Clothing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hostyle Clothing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ttonyb (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Hostyle Clothing. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

How articles for deletion works
Hi. The tag at the top of the page is just to let other readers know about the deletion discussion. Please stop removing it. If you want to save the article, please visit Articles for deletion/Hostyle Clothing and explain why it should be kept instead. Thanks. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Hostyle Clothing, you may be blocked from editing. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 10:38, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Hostyle Clothing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  ttonyb (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hostyle Clothing
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hostyle Clothing, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hostyleclothing.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hostyle Clothing


A tag has been placed on Hostyle Clothing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Some Wiki Editor (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)