User talk:JRPierson

Credititis
Wikipedia is not for advertising, sorry. Friday (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

It's not very helpful to just repost the same stuff that was deleted, without addressing the concerns that lead to the deletion. Are you here to promote some company, or to contribute to an encyclopedia? Friday (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

I know creditis is not a company, but it appears to be a proprietary term used only by one company, for marketing purposes. So, it looks to me like the article was intended as promotional material for this 1st Liberty Service Company. If your intent was really to create an encyclopedia article about this trademark, the article needs to show some indication of why this particular trademark, out of the millions, belongs in an encyclopedia. This is done by showing that the topic has gotten significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the company who owns it. You should also be aware of the guidelines at Conflict of interest, since it appears that you have one.

The other thing to consider is, rather than making an article on this one little detail, why not start with an article about the company? Presumably this would be much easier, if the company itself has gotten significant media coverage. It's usually the case that the company will have far more sources about it than about one particular advertising term they invented. A quick google turned up nothing obvious about this company though, so maybe there just aren't sources out there. Friday (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)