User talk:JRobinson99

May 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Birds of Prey (2020 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Birds of Prey (2020 film), you may be blocked from editing. Crboyer (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Birds of Prey (2020 film). ''Talk page consensus says to keep that point. If you have a counterpoint, bring it up on the talk page. '' Crboyer (talk) 01:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Birds of Prey vandalism
I see you were warned multiple times already, but please stop reverting the cited material on Birds of Prey, especially if you’re not going to offer a reason. Thanks. TropicAces (talk) 16:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)tropicAces

July 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Birds of Prey (2020 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been asked to discuss your edits on the page, but you haven't. Please do. Crboyer (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruptive removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. –Darkwind (talk) 06:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC) It appears that you have a clear "point of view" or agenda to push here regarding this film; the only content you keep removing from the film is that which could be considered negative. Wikipedia has a strict neutral point of view policy which must be followed in all articles; removing only negative material is considered disruptive and has resulted in this block from editing. When the block expires, please avoid such biased editing. –Darkwind (talk) 06:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Emmanuel Petit. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hi, any particular reason you're changing all my edits and ignoring the note left on each page indicating why the credit isn't in the actor's filmography? Could you please not do it again? It's quite annoying to have to do it all over again for each page. TDFan1000 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please stop removing sourced information without providing a valid reason. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. --ภץאคгöร 19:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I apologies for that but the reason for me removing the edit is because I believe the film didn’t not receive mixed review,it was mostly positive JRobinson99 (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tony Adams, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at DC Extended Universe. InfiniteNexus (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Zack Snyder's Justice League, you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Dark Knight (film). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 06:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Man of Steel (film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 19:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

What I did wasn’t vandalism can you pls reconsider JRobinson99 (talk) 14:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The Suicide Squad vandalism
Why do you keep removing the fact the film underperformed at the box office? It is a fact supported by 2 articles. If you continue to revert to your preferred version, you may be forbidden from editing The Suicide Squad. In additon, you should be aware of the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not make more than three reverts on a page within 24 hours. Please do not violate the rule. Saul Grant (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:DCExtendedUniverse.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:DCExtendedUniverse.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 08:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You are hereby given two weeks off from editing articles. Please use those two weeks to read over the warnings on this talk page, to study the edits that prompted other editors to warn you, to respond to messages left here by your fellow editors on this collaborative project (you've managed ONE on this talk page, and only FOUR on user talk pages as a whole), to figure out what our guidelines are for reliable sources (IMDB is not one of them), to learn to write proper edit summaries (I count four for your last 100 edits), to stop edit warring, and to stop bloating the lead of articles like you did here. We are an encyclopedia, not a database full of factoids. Two things: Wikia may be more your thing, and if you come back after two weeks and engage in the same behavior, you are likely to get blocked indefinitely, possibly per NOTHERE--I just noticed that you managed to never have used the article talk pages either. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Why did you block me JRobinson99 (talk) 19:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

You blocked for no reason at all JRobinson99 (talk) 19:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

You have made a mistake, if your blocking me for my edits on the dc comics page Pls understand that I wasn’t trying to create a database, I was simply adding popular dc characters that larger public would recognise. Not everyone knows dc comics that well. JRobinson99 (talk) 20:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

So again I ask pls reconsider ? JRobinson99 (talk) 20:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DCExtendedUniverse.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:DCExtendedUniverse.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DCExtendedUniverse.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:DCExtendedUniverse.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Aquaman (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Do you seriously want to be blocked again? This time, it's probably going to be indefinite, so please start paying attention to what people tell you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)