User talk:JS18WlKlPEDlA/Archive 1

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Born Rich, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.''I know this is a contentious group of articles given Metal Rabbit, but you need to stick to Wikipedia rules. Don't keep redlinks of articles that were deleted. Don't insert advertising external links in the middle of articles. Don't add extraneous external links to non-notable individuals. Read WP:EXT and WP:NOTABLE'' Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 16:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I have again reverted your series of edits on Born Rich that are contrary to Wikipedia guidelines. As has already been explained to you twice: as stated in the first sentence of External links, external links (the links you added to IMDb for various persons mentioned in the article) are not permitted in the body of an article; moreover, they are not helpful or appropriate here.  In addition, your edit to the Modern Luxury footnote (#2) wasn't constructive: there is no reason to take out the name of the publication in which a source appears.  Your edit to the Daily Mail edit (#9) wasn't constructive, because you again replaced the correct URL with an incorrect URL.  And your edit to the External links section wasn't constructive, because you again deleted an external link without an explanation, after having previously removed the same link on the incorrect ground that it was an unrepairable deadlink, when in fact it only needed to have the URL updated.  Please don't continue to make unconstructive changes and changes that are contrary to Wikipedia's guidelines. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Born Rich (film). Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Arxiloxos (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Born Rich (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Amaury (talk) 00:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Thanks for the valuable input. In this particular case I accepted the reverts done to remove inappropriate linking practices to the individuals not cited or referenced in the film. I will study how to properly enhance the article to all of the individuals featured in the film and fix that. I do however dispute the negative comments that were left by user:Shibbolethink because they seem heavily biased and the statement does not reflect the information in the article cited. In fact the article makes no mention of the statement given by user:Shibbolethink about Weil. The same information discussing controvery has already been cited 4 other times. It seems at this point that it is not a NPOV and there is some bias against this particular person by making special mention when more notable individuals were also unhappy and threatened to sue (also overly covered in the many redundant cites by user:Shibbolethink. Seems to be pulling the focus off of everything about the film itself and directing it to that.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Born Rich (film), you may be blocked from editing. ''Don't continue to remove well sourced material that is supported by WP:RSes. If necessary we can take this to Administrators Noticeboard.'' Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 01:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I have removed the warnings you placed on various editors' talk pages. Far from hounding you, these editors are editing according to policy (with those inline links, for instance), and adding and restoring valid and referenced content. You are edit warring, your edits are against policy, and you appear to be trying to strong-arm other editors into compliance, and these are very blockable infractions. Please let this not go any further: you are welcome to take these matters up on the article talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)