User talk:JS2COMM

Re:Moonview Sanctuary
The draft is making progress, but the article is still problematic. Most of the article is based on a case study. Such information should only be included if it can be referenced to a neutral third party source. For information from a case study to be included, I would expect it to come from a reputable journal. A case study produced by Moonview is not a reliable source for information on itself. - SimonP (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Moonview sanctuary
A tag has been placed on Moonview sanctuary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Moonview sanctuary and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smartse (talk) 16:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've looked at Promises Treatment Centers and can probably tell you why it has not been deleted and why Moonview Sanctuary has been put forward for deletion. Firstly Promises Treatment Centers lists 7 independent sources, I'm not certain that your references are "reliable sources". See Reliable sources for some guidance. Secondly Promises Treatment Centers does not list any information about which specific treatments they provide whereas Moonview sanctuary does - this in particular makes it read like an advert. I'm also not sure if Moonview sanctuary meets these guidelines either [] but considering the celebrity patients Promises Treatment Centers probably does. If you can rewrite Moonview sanctuary in a simliar form to Promises Treatment Centers then I am sure it won't be deleted. If you want more info, please message me. Thanks Smartse (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Darylpic.jpg
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Darylpic.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Daryl Wizelman
I have nominated Daryl Wizelman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Daryl Wizelman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is not the content itself, it's a question of whether the subject matter meets our general notability guideline. You are welcome to voice your opinion on the deletion discussion above, but in my opinion there just don't seem to be reliable sources supporting the inclusion of this article in Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Moonview sanctuary for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moonview sanctuary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Moonview sanctuary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Musa Talk  15:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Darylpic.jpg


The file File:Darylpic.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 07:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)