User talk:JSPolitic

Chinese socialism
"Chinese socialism" is a vague term which can mean multiple things. This is why it is a disambiguation page. In English media "Socialism with Chinese characteristics" is the common name of the ideology of the Chinese Communist Party. If you want to argue the contrary, start a discussion at Talk:Socialism with Chinese characteristics. Centre Left Right ✉ 07:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Taliban, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
FDW777 (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:American Independent Party. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 12:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

I am commenting on the content and am stating how it relates to bias on the rest of the site. I am simply correcting a mistake and making sure it doesn’t happen again. JSPolitic (talk) 00:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Workers' Party
Hi, I just wanted to point you in the direction of WP:CON -- I think it really applies to your most recent edit to Workers' Party of Korea, which I reverted because I felt like it needed more consensus built about the topic, considering how divisive the talk page is. Thank you! ɯ ɐ ɔ 💬 05:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

How Wikipedia works
Content that you add to Wikipedia has to be reliably sourced. You cannot justify your edits in long edit summaries by citing how you personally feel about a particular subject. If you claim to have reliable sources, bring them. Otherwise it is original research. It does not matter what you personally believe is the correct analysis of something, you need sources to show that you are not citing an obscure opinion. You do not get the content you want on Wikipedia by immediately reverting other users' edits and debating other editors as to why you think you are correct without citing any of Wikipedia's policies. Centre Left Right ✉ 21:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Proud Boys. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Feudalist Party (U.S)


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Feudalist Party (U.S), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EDM fan 2 (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, JSPolitic,
 * I recommend you start an article in Draft space and improve it until it meets Wikipedia's standards. Incomplete articles or articles without references that are put into main space of the project are likely to get tagged for speedy deletion.
 * If you have questions about article creation or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse where you can get advice and support. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at United Russia, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Poorly sourced? Are you morons that ignorant? I implemented putinism, just as someone else did on the party list page, I didn’t see a single damn source there, and you had no problem with it. I have plenty of sources for the far-right, but you aren’t excepting them nor acknowledging them. JSPolitic (talk) 03:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

The only thing poorly sourced is your illogical “sources” claiming it’s some kind of big tent. JSPolitic (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey JSPolitic, if you're reading this, GET A LIFE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magellan Fan (talk • contribs) 01:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:JSPolitic. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. As I already explained to you in the "Sources" section above, do not involve in personal attacks others — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

How about you acknowledge my reasoning for making the changes I made instead of pathetically reverting my changes and going off topic? JSPolitic (talk) 16:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at United Russia. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Wow so you have no logical coherent rebuttal so you resort to blocking me, how pathetic. JSPolitic (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

WP:CIVIL
Your edit summaries are routinely hostile. Tone it down - Wikipedia is not a battleground. Please read WP:CIVIL — Czello 21:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

I would like to “tone it down”, however your moderators are being unreasonable. JSPolitic (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)