User talk:JT TRASH

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear JT TRASH,

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community Portal
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How to edit a page
 * How to revert to a previous version of a page
 * Tutorial
 * Copyrights
 * Shortcuts

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes. The software that runs Wikipedia will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.

I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself on your userpage.

--PEAR 00:38, August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Pure rubbish article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -- The Anome 00:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The copyright has been cleared up on this article, and you're free to continue editing and improving it.--Crossmr 02:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

It's still full of direct lifts from the MySpace page: see, for example and  Why not try writing an article from scratch, without copying from elsewhere any then trying to "clear up" its copyright status? It's easier than you might think, and will probably result in a better article. -- The Anome 10:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Ah: I see, this user has stated on Talk:Pure Rubbish that they are the author of the MySpace article, and they have given verifiable contact details. That's probably OK for now, although they should probably read Wikipedia's autobiography policy soon. Can they show that the band meets the WP:BAND inclusion citeria? -- The Anome 10:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

JT TRASH, please accept my apologies: I hope you understand why your article was flagged in this way; we take other people's copyright very seriously, including yours. -- The Anome 10:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Helpme
What kind of help do you need? Please remember that the is only for use on your talk page. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 02:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi I addes sources to the Pure Rubbish page. I believe this article metts the WP: Band limitations. Thanks!

Sources for the Pure Rubbish article
I believe that the sources in the article mentioned above are adequate enough to assert the notability of the group. As long as the sources are mentioned somewhere within the article, you should be ok as far as citing sources are concerned.

Also, please remember to sign messages when you leave them on talk pages. You can do so by using four tildes (~), or by pressing the Signature button on the toolbar (it looks like a signature). It helps identify who sent the message and makes it easier for me to reply. Thanks, --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 01:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * IF you feel that you have properly cited the sources, then you can remove the tag yourself. However, if it is put back, you can find out who placed it and ask them why they tagged the article. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 02:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Go to the article, and when you click edit, look for, and delete that. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 02:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Uploading photos
First of all, what is the source of the photos? I can help you cite them right if I have an idea where they are from. Special:Upload is where you need to go to upload images. In the Summary box you can enter some information, so that you can have some description for the image, but that info will not appear on the pages when you use the image. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 03:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Since the photos are yours, you can submit them to the Public Domain. If you have not uploaded the photos yet, then you should go here and follow the instructions.


 * What you see on the Guns N' Roses page is called an Infobox. If you wish to use something like that on your band's page, I would suggest copying the code for the box to your page, and replacing the information already in the box with the appropriate info. for your band. Make sure that you get the exact file names for the pictures that you wish to use, so that they do not end up as red links on your page. To insert images on other parts of the page, you can click the Image button on the toolbar and type the file name of the image. I hope that this helps explain the process of inserting photos onto your page. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 22:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Keith Richards edits
I reverted the edits you made, and I think you should read that page's TALK section to understand why. Talk:Keith Richards

Since you obviously know a lot about Richards, I encourage you to add material that makes the article better, but you need to explain your additions/changes in wither the "Edit Summary" or the "TALK/DISCUSSION" page, or both. otherwise, your contributions don't make a lot of sense. Wikipedia does try to offer valid sources for their articles, and you need to be aware that your knowledge may be correct, but you still need to offer some other independent source. Happy contributing. --Mikerussell 03:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I re-added a modified list of vocals, don't know if it will last, the other stuff you added, and took out, you can add again as far as I am concerned as long as you try to explain it so others can understand the change, that was my primary complaint.--Mikerussell 04:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I think this what you are talking about retreiving?

The Stones recently released Rarities 1971-2003 (2006), which includes sixteen rare and limited released recordings. Richards has termed the released output of the Stones as the "tip of the iceberg." Many Rolling Stones unreleased outakes, alternate versions, and studio jams are among the most widely bootlegged recordings in rock and roll history.

Many unreleased outtakes (some included on bootlegs) include Keith Richards on lead vocals on the Jagger / Richards penned songs including "Gimme Shelter", "Brown Sugar", "Rip This Joint", "Scarlet", "I Got A Letter", "Holding On", "Bad Luck", "I Can't Help It" (written about Anita Pallenberg), "I Think I'm Going Mad", "Crushed Pearl", and "Almost Hear You Sigh".

Many bootlegs featuring Keith Richards covering classic country, early rock n roll, blues, and pop standards include the Interchange studio sessions (recorded in 1977, Toronto, Canada), Eldorado studio sessions (recorded in 1981, Los Angeles, CA), Long View Farm studio sessions (recorded in 1981, North Brookfield, MA), the wedding tapes (recorded in a hotel room in 1983, Cabo San Lucas, Mexico), and Windmill Lane studio sessions (recorded in 1993, Dublin, Ireland).

Some songs Richards has covered by other artists include Chuck Berry's "Run Rudolph Run" and "Memphis", Jimmy Cliff's "The Harder They Come", Merle Haggard's "Sing Me Back Home", Johnny Paycheck's "Apartment Number 9", Dallas Frazier's "Say It's Not You", Jack Ripley's "Your Angels Step Out Of Heaven", Sam Cooke's "Let's Go Steady Again", Seals / Fritts's "We Had It All", Big Bill Broonzy's "Key To The Highway", Everly Brothers's "All I have To Do Is Dream", Jerry Lee Lewis's "Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On", Hoagy Carmichael's Nearness Of You, Elvis Presley's "All Shook Up", Robert Johnson's "32-20 Blues", Lennon / McCartney's "Please Please Me", Buddy Holly's "That'll Be The Day", Bob Dylan's "Girl From The North Country", Reverend Gary Davis's "Cocaine Blues", and Hank Williams's "You Win Again".

Since unreleased recordings most often appear as post-career or as posthumous releases, trading of these bootlegs is common on peer-to-peer sharing programs.


 * You can re-add it yourself. Now I don't have time to look it over. What I mean about explaining is simpling offering a reason for inclusion on the TALK page or in the edit summary- as why you think the article needs the information. Right now it seems like the info above is similiar to the listed section about 'popular bootlegs'. What does it add to the article? Maybe you know more than me, as why it is important. Other thing about getting it edited out is that people will take it down, giving their reasons, and it may go back and forth for awhile but eventually a consensus will develop whether it should be included. People tend look over favorite articles and make sure the content and quality stays high. There are a lot of recurrent editors on the Richards page, not just me. Hope this makes sense to you.--Mikerussell 03:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Dog'sdamour83.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dog'sdamour83.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 09:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:1472960283_l.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:1472960283_l.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  02:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Glamorous Youth Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Glamorous Youth Cover.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 04:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Pure Rubbish.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pure Rubbish.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 08:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Penny Royal (band)


A tag has been placed on Penny Royal (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)