User talk:JTtheOG


 * Archives:
 * Archive 1 (2012/13)
 * Archive 2 (2014/15)
 * Archive 3 (2016)
 * Archive 4 (2017)
 * Archive 5 (2018)
 * Archive 6 (2019)
 * Archive 7 (2020)
 * Archive 8 (2021)
 * Archive 9 (2022)
 * Archive 10 (2023)

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are:, , and. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft: American Junior Red Cross
Okay, I added a Ref. showing notability (Re: 22 million). Also stretched out the article a little to be more all-encompassing. I mean, to give a more complete picture of the organization. It's far more notable than an athlete appearing in one game in the pros, IMO. Thanks for hopefully putting it through. However, either way, I really didn't want to spend much time on this. I just wanted to start this worthy article. It was once a major branch of the Red Cross. JimPercy (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Okay, I added some more to give it completeness. JimPercy (talk) 13:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robelyn Garcia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kimberly Remak has been accepted
 Kimberly Remak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Kimberly_Remak help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Ca talk to me!  16:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome JTtheOG! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles. CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JTtheOG&action=purge refresh via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2006 NFL Europe season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankfurt Galaxy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Adam Hicks (American football)
Hey @JTtheOG

Would you mind taking another review of Draft:Adam Hicks (American football) because I added a few sources that should be able to make it notable enough to be on the main space.

I submitted it for review and I would appreciate it if you could give it another look. ParkerLyme (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks like someone got to it! Good work, JTtheOG (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

A Review Request
Good day, Please take a look at this article "The Next Star Awards". I've been working on it for a while and it's unreviewed. Regards. TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter
The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer, who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * , with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
 * , with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
 * , with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
 * , with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
 * , with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
 * and, both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

FEB24 Drive
Damn, you're on a roll with this one. Thank you so much for being a dedicated member of the drive. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

about Fabio Grossi (actor)
Good morning from Campora San Giovanni, I'm writing to say hello and find out how you are, as well as telling you that I followed your advice, I was wondering if you could lend a helping hand now. Of course, if you need anything, count on me, in the meantime I thank you for the report and while waiting to hear from you, I greet you with respect and cordiality. Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 11:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Congrats on surpassing 1k
I want to give a personal thank you to you for your motivation towards improving articles' references. Though you have "only" dealed with ~1% articles in the backlog, your impact is much greater than you might imagine. You have help set a fire for future endeavors to make Wikipedia more complete and comprehensive. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * As you have well surpassed 750 articles cited, I would like to award you the level 10 badge early. Perhaps, a quote from one of our writers who has recently passed away would be the most appropriate here for the monumental work – citing all articles on Wikipedia – that we are dealing with. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Topicon completionism-blue.svg - CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Wow! I cannot even imagine how to find sources for hundreds of unsourced articles. But these awesome editors inspire me to work harder and smarter. Thanks.Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * , Thank you both. :) Happy editing. JTtheOG (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Review of new pages.
Hello! Could you review of these pages: Aznaur Tavaev, Azamat Akhmedov, Dmitrii Adamov, Roman Tsarev and Ruslan Belkhoroev? Thank you! -- Ricco Baroni (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Mexican Softball League
Hey, brother. I just created an article for the Mexican Softball League. I was wondering if you could take a look and let me know if the article could be improved in any way. I would really appreciate it. Cheers. Cocu15 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey Great work on the article, as always. Exciting stuff going on in Mexican sports right now. I don't see too much to contribute myself but I'll try to stay updated on the league and look out for any news, for sure. JTtheOG (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter
The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:


 * , who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
 * , who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
 * , who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
 * , who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
 * , who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
 * , who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to, who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

A citation barnstar for you

 * Thank you; I appreciate your kind words. JTtheOG (talk) 03:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
I appreciate it very much! JTtheOG (talk) 03:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belize men's under-20 international footballers


A tag has been placed on Category:Belize men's under-20 international footballers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Draftifying articles
I see that you have just removed two of my recently created rugby union articles into draftspace on grounds of lack of references. The Royal Bassett article has now been improved and expanded, and the number of references has been increased from two to eight, and none are primary references from their website. Therefore, can you please reinstate it back to mainspace. I shall now look to do the same with Hammersmith and Fulham and I hope you won't relegate any more of my articles from Wikipedia.Rillington (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, Royal Wootton Bassett is the club in question, thus sources 1 and 2 cannot be used to establish notability. The Rugby Football Union is directly associated with the club, thus sources 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 cannot be used to establish notability. I am sure that Source 3 has plenty of in-depth coverage of the club, but I am unable to access the text. JTtheOG (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The RFU is not associated, even indirectly, with any club - it's the sport's governing body. Therefore its website is independent of the subject.Rillington (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It is generally agreed upon that sports governing bodies are not independent of the teams or athletes that compete under their jurisdiction. JTtheOG (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This is the first I've heard of this and I've been producing articles on English rugby union clubs for a decade. Plus it is also generally agreed that any club which has played at tier 5 of the English rugby league system is seen as notable. RWB played at this level for three seasons and H&F currently play at this level.Rillington (talk) 11:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Draft:Royal Wootton Bassett RFC has multiple primary and secondary references, including both the RFU pages as well as Rothman's Rugby Union Yearbook. These are the gold standard for rugby union and are notable sources. Tier 5 clubs play in the 'National Leagues' so this should also be considered when it comes to notability. Recommend keeping pages with note on adding future sources to help with reinforcing validaty as opposed to removing pages. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey. As someone who also has also been creating sports articles for over a decade, it somewhat troubling that you would think this way. The RFU is simply not an independent source. At the time of draftification, the article had two sources: a link to the club's contacts page and a dead link to a results page from 8 years ago posted by the RFU. I hope we can all agree that this is nowhere near enough sources to meet notability guidelines, no matter which tier they are currently in, and it would be irresponsible of me to mark it as patrolled. Instead of deleting a page not ready for the mainspace, I draftified it to give you (or others) enough time to come up with better sourcing and re-submit it. I'm AGF that the Rothman's Yearbook has adequate in-depth coverage of the subject, but once again, this was not present in the originally published version of the article. JTtheOG (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Whoops.  I forgot to ping I suppose. JTtheOG (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Gibraltarian taxi drivers has been nominated for merging
Category:Gibraltarian taxi drivers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

How to Become a Cult Leader
Thanks for the redundancy catch! I missed it somehow! Rp2006 (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * No worries, happens to the best of us! Cheers mate. JTtheOG (talk) 02:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Audi Crooks
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Audi Crooks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Audi Crooks
The article Audi Crooks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Audi Crooks and Talk:Audi Crooks/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

""Don't Turn Around" (Album)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%22Don%27t_Turn_Around%22_(Album)&redirect=no "Don't Turn Around" (Album)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Deletion rationales
Hello, JTtheOG,

I'd like to request that on any future articles you nominate for PRODs or AFDs, that you do not mention that the article was created by Lugnuts. The identify of the editor who created an article, unless they are a sockpuppet, is really irrelevant to whether or not we should keep or delete an article. Basically, I think you can make a strong argument for deletion without drawing attention to a fellow editor.

There are many of us who worked with Lugnuts before he was blocked and while his editing was problematic, it just seems a bit mean-spirited to use his name as shorthand for an article that should be deleted. I respect the work that you do and I'm asking for this favor as a fellow editor, not an administrator who deletes a lot of PRODs and closes a lot of AFDs. For what it's worth, I think it might be appropriate to mention his participation while you are responding to other editors in AFD comments but just not in your deletion rationale, as the primary reason for an article's deletion. Thank you for considering this request. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I certainly meant no ill will towards them and was simply attempting to provide context using a phrase I had seen others use in the past. I suppose I had not fully considered the implications of invoking their username. JTtheOG (talk) 01:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Request new draft
Will handle this page. You can help us in adding this page to Wikipedia.Draft:Ramkripalyadavge Muskang375 (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Símun Sólheim
Why have you moved my article about a footballer into draft, refering to lack of cources. In fact there are a lot of sources, even uefa.com, wich is the most trustworthy of all sources regarding footballers. You have obviously done this by routine, and not checked the vaildy of the sources in the article. RonTho (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey This was a deliberate draftification. In order to better establish notability of this footballer, you must demonstrate that there is significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Source 1 (worldfootball.net) is a database and is thus not significant coverage of the subject. Source 2 (in.fo) is a short transactional announcement and is thus not significant coverage of the subject. Source 3 (B36) is his employer and is thus not independent of the subject. I am unable to access Source 4 (faroesoccer.com), but judging by the URL it seems to be a match report, and is thus not significant coverage of the subject. I draftified your article instead of nominating for deletion in order to allow you the time to present sources that establish notability. Hope this helps and happy editing. JTtheOG (talk) 20:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You did not mention the most reliable source - uefa.com Is that not sufficient enough, regarding footballers? And what about soccerway.com?
 * I sincerely ask you to do a proper work, instead of what you are preforming here. RonTho (talk) 22:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You are correct. This is not sufficient enough because stats databases do not contribute towards notability, as I mentioned in my previous comment. JTtheOG (talk) 22:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Hans Werner Sokop
Hi JTtheOG,

I've seen that you have tagged my article about Hans Werner Sokop (if this is not the case, please accept my apologies).

In the meantime, I've added a section with external links of libraries etc. that prove the literary production of Hans Werner Sokop.

Is there anything else that is necessary to prove that the content is correct and valuable?

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Uto (talk) 13:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi JTtheOG,
 * I've added the citations and references needed, thus verifying the content of the last paragraph of the section "Life".
 * Therefore, I've removed the tag (also as there is no contentious and libelous content).
 * I hope this is OK for you.
 * Otherwise, please advise me what I can do to further improve the article.
 * Kind Regards,
 * Uto (talk) 09:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Audi Crooks
The article Audi Crooks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Audi Crooks for comments about the article, and Talk:Audi Crooks/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

A question about page review
Hello @JTtheOG, A few days ago, I stumbled a think that I don't fully understand and I would appreciate your opinion. I have created some Wikipedia pages and all of them have received "reviewed" status. One didn't – Kurk Lietuvai. Ironically, it's the one that I happened to put the most effort in and wanted to do as good as I could. Even much newer pages that I created have already been reviewed, e.g. Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve. How come that my articles get reviewed, but one is "stuck" and doesn't? What difference on Wikipedia does it make if an article has been reviewed?

Best regards, Frequently.by.train (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there. I wouldn't exactly be able to tell you, because it shows up as reviewed for me. Good work, though. JTtheOG (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:


 * with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
 * with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
 * with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
 * with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
 * with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herbert Permillion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

SusuGeo
SusuGeo seems to have copy-pasted back all/some of the pages you moved to draft. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 14:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


 * let me look back it SusuGeo (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I strongly recommend you utilize the Articles for creation process to create new articles. they generally give decent feedback for you to improve the article prior to it 'going live' in article space. and you especially cannot just copy the content back into the article. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 15:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the helpful feedback SusuGeo (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, JTtheOG. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
 * with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
 * with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
 * with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
 * with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:Hey man im josh submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * I nominate JTtheOG to be Editor of the Week for their ability to "crush" backlogs. They do very impressive work at NPP. Last year JTtheOG reviewed over 10,000 articles as part of new page patrolling, making this the fifth time they've done so in a single year. This also marks the (at least) seventh consecutive year that they've reviewed at least 5,000 articles. Due to this impressive and continued effort, they currently rank second all-time in article reviews. In addition, they recently won the 2024 January NPP backlog drive and the WP:FEB24 unreferenced backlog drive. I think it's time we give them some deserved recognition for the truly amazing amount of work they do. This nomination was seconded by Novem Linguae and Queen of Hearts.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven   Talk  (UTC) 12:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh wow, thank you all so much! I'm honored that anyone would bring my (user)name up in the discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks
Greetings JG, thank you for reviewing the 1948-49 AC Milan season. Best regards.HugoAcosta9 (talk) 17:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Suriname national futsal team
Hi JTtheOG, I saw that your article on the Suriname national futsal team was put into the draft section. I have made some additions to it and the problems of the sources must be over. English is not my native language, so would you please do a last check on the text? and do a request to get it back to the main space? Thanks, regards, Ymnes (talk) 12:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * O, I see now that it is not your article. But may be you could look if it's okay for you now anyway? Thanks :-) Ymnes (talk) 12:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frayles de Guasave logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Frayles de Guasave logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Cruz Surf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:2023 Portishead Town Council Election
Was this draftification requested by anyone or is there an editor who has indicated they would be working on improving the draft? ~Kvng (talk) 13:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * No, not as far as I know. JTtheOG (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'd like to invoke WP:DRAFTOBJECT here. I agree with the notability concerns raised by User:Number 57 so once it is moved back to mainspace, I think it best to WP:BLAR it to North Somerset Council elections as an WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I missed the PROD. No problem with deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I don't like to see WP:DRAFTIFY used unless someone intends to work on the article. If it's "not ready for mainspace", it's not going to magically improve in draft space so let's delete it or find an WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Warren Meck
Hello, I nominated Warren Meck for deletion. You can give your opinion. GiladSeg (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Skating PRODs
Hello, JTtheOG,

It seems like you are taking issue with this glut of PRODs on junior competition skaters. If you want to see other articles tagged as PRODs, you can review User talk:Awartha since this editor created many of the articles that were tagged for deletion and you can look over User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary for upcoming PRODs. I think over the past three weeks, we've probably deleted 50 or 60 of these articles.

The only editor who has raised concerns thus far is User:Kvng who is the only editor I know of who regularly reviews the PROD list to see if the proposed deletions are appropriate. I just thought I'd pass along this information. To be honest, I'm not well-versed on WP:NSKATE which is the primary argument for the deletion of all of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Liz, I appreciate you reaching out. I fear that I don't trust that this editor does any WP:BEFORE searches at all, so I've reverted all his PRODs from the past week. He predictably responded with this temper tantrum -- irresponsible to say the very least. Is there anything that can be done about that? There is no way the community can parse through sources for this many BLPs. JTtheOG (talk) 03:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for slowing this roll. I've posted elsewhere that I don't think we're equipped to responsibly review these proposals at the rate they have been arriving and I haven't been able summon any help on it so they've been rolling to deletion. There are at least a few of these currently working their way through AfD, and at this point it doesn't look to be easy to predict, just by looking at the article, which ones will be deleted. ~Kvng (talk) 13:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * For my part, I think it's irresponsible to just revert PRODs when it's apparent that you've not attempted to find sources yourself. In the case of the AfD I've just run into on one, the article was created over seventeen years ago -- the community plainly has HAD time to parse through sources for it, and demonstrably doesn't give a damn.   Ravenswing      00:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The burden of finding sources in deletion proposals (both prod and AfD AFAIC) is on the proposer (WP:BEFORE). The fact that an article has not been significantly worked on in x years is not a valid reason to delete it (WP:DEL-REASON). ~Kvng (talk) 13:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Re:Klub Kosova Hamburg moved to draftspace
Hello JTtheOG, How are you? I am new to wikipedia and am still getting used to how things work around here. I was wondering why this article was moved to draftspace. When I categorize it as a stub, isn't it okay to put it in mainspace. Also, is there anything wrong with the references I added that takes away this topic's notability? All the best,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm doing good and I hope that you are as well. In order to establish notability of people or organizations, you must demonstrate that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You can read more about what this means at Notability. In the meantime, I draftified the article to give you or others time to come up with references from independent sources that cover the subject (in this case the club) "directly and in detail." JTtheOG (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, I think I understand. However, how is this different than for example NKK SC, which has no references which is still in mainspace. MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Well yes, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. "Plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet." You are welcome to nominate NKK SC for deletion, but I am highly doubtful that sources do not exist considering the club played in the top-flight Japan Soccer League for almost three decades. JTtheOG (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're right, thanks for clarifying. MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

DavidLofgren1996
I don't think it's a good idea to pursue inquiries on their talkpage - they talked themselves into an indefinite block at AN by making egregious personal attacks, and it's really not appropriate or kind to them under the circumstances to use their talkpage for general inquiries or discussion.  Acroterion   (talk)   19:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Reasonable enough. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 19:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Canoeists by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Canoeists by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Curlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Curlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Fencers by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Fencers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Figure skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Figure skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Golfers by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Golfers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Gymnasts by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Gymnasts by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Handball players by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Handball players by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Ice hockey people by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Ice hockey people by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Racing drivers by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Racing drivers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Sport shooters by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Sport shooters by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Speed skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Speed skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Water polo players by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Water polo players by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Category:Sport wrestlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming
Category:Sport wrestlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Progress Chapter Two: The March Of Progress deletion nomination
Hello, thank you for reviewing the Progress Chapter Two: The March Of Progress article. However, I noticed some other user tagged it with a deletion nomination. Which decision has priority in this case? Your review or his tag? I suppose I'm not allowed to remove his tag until a potential discussion is over. The thing is that it might never occur and the article might get deleted senselessly. I just started the Progress Chapters project as they must be categorized, documented and sorted out. What can be done in order for the article to be kept on the mainspace? Thanks! JeyReydar97 (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If other editors decide that it doesn't meet the notability guidelines, I'm afraid there is nothing that can be done to keep it in the mainspace. You could argue for the article to be draftified in order to not lose your work and allow you to find more sources to show notability. JTtheOG (talk) 21:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bataconcica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Hi JTtheOG! Thanks for reviewing my articles over the past few months. I have just been granted autopatrolled rights, so hopefully you will not come across my articles again while patrolling new pages. Here is a barnstar for your contributions in reviewing new film articles. Keep up the great work!! —  Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ）  14:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for reviewing Noa Cochva so quickly. I created 2 pages a while ago via AFC and they're both still awaiting review, would you mind taking a look at them? Draft:Rivka Bayech is pretty straight forward. Then there's Draft:Logan_Levkoff that was originally created and deleted over 10 years ago or something like that so it's a bit more complicated. MaskedSinger (talk) 19:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Aimee Aikenhead
You've nominated the aforementioned page I created for deletion but I don't understand why. It ha sources including BBC, Jersey Evening Post and ESPNcricinfo and links to several other pages on Wikipedia. I also don't understand how to fight my case. Shrug02 (talk) 22:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello there. Biographies of living people require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Both BBC articles have exactly one mention of her while the Evening Post seems to have three sentences covering her. I hope you can see how this is not enough in-depth coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. JTtheOG (talk) 23:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * There are dozens of pages I've seen with one source and one fact on like Joe Blogs went to the Olympics for Tunisia in 2016 etc. I appreciate this subject does not have huge amounts of coverage but it is more than those sort of articles plus the subject is likely to increase in notability bearing in mind how young she is and how much more international cricket she is likely to play. Shrug02 (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. "Plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet." You are welcome to nominate those for deletion. If Aikenhead becomes notable in the future, you will have access to the article history in order to recreate the page. Until then, unless you can present better sources, it is up to the discretion of the discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have added further content and citations since you asked for its deletion. But I give up. I was trying to make a full set of pages for all the Jersey women's national cricket team that have done anything but I'll abandon it. Shrug02 (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Maria Da Rocha
I don't understand the message regarding this page. This has all gone from being a fun and, I thought, helpful activity to being some sort of online battle. I'm jacking it all in. I've created 60 plus pages and done 2000 plus edits all in good faith in the last three months but I don't need the hassle. Shrug02 (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The message is the same as for the last article. I am unable to find enough coverage that covers the subject directly and in-depth, as is required of all biographies. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok. Delete it and all the rest of my project. Shrug02 (talk) 23:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I do not have that ability. It is up for a community discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sure the discussion will go your way as you are the authority figure and I am a nobody. I just don't get it. I can't even find where to object to this deleting. You had no problems with my earlier Jersey Cricket articles but now there's an issue when I'm using the same sources. Shrug02 (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am no more an authority figure than you are. I am just a nobody on the internet. You are encouraged to contribute to the discussion here, as you already have. If you are referring to Sally Barton, she has clearly received multiple pieces of in-depth coverage, which are missing from both Aikenhead and Da Rocha's articles. JTtheOG (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not referring to Sally Barton. I am referring to the half a dozen Jersey player articles that were reviewed and approved today. Shrug02 (talk) 23:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't believe I was involved in reviewing those. JTtheOG (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * i have no idea who reviewed them but no doubt you intend to seek them out and have them deleted too. You have approved many of my previous articles over the last 3 months. Also I can't find the discussion page for Da Rocha Shrug02 (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, once again, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument to keep this article. There is, as you have acknowledged, a serious lack of sourcing. The Da Rocha discussion can be found here. JTtheOG (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Sovenfire3982 Page Reviews
Hey there JTtheOG! I'd love to thank you for reviewing multiple new pages of mine (Queen Degenerate, Girlie Pop, etc.) If you don't have too much on your plate, could I possibly ask you to review two of my new ones that are stuck in the queue? Drew Louis & Heatwave (Bronze Avery album). No worries if you have too much on your plate- just thought I'd ask. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sovenfire3982 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much!! Sovenfire3982 (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:


 * with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
 * with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
 * with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
 * with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello, can you please help me?
Hello, I hope all is well. Could you take a look at an article I created - The Country Club of Farmington, 1892-1995? Do you have any suggestions? JoeK2033 (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey there; nice work. My immediate suggestion would be to take a look at WP:OVERLINK and WP:LINKONCE. JTtheOG (talk) 20:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

New article - Bahishkarana
Hi

I have worked on this new article Bahishkarana.

Request you to look into this and suggest how I can make it better. This is a new Telugu web series. Filmy World (talk) 17:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cookie Brinkman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cookie Brinkman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald C. Carlson (July 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald C. Carlson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Donald_C._Carlson Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SafariScribe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Donald_C._Carlson reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald C. Carlson has been accepted
 Donald C. Carlson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Donald_C._Carlson help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Pages Reviewed Request
Hello, can you review the article I wrote this: The Haunted House Special: The Vampire of Light and the Child of Darkness? Do you think my article was okay? Shockingman173223 (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cookie Brinkman
The article Cookie Brinkman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cookie Brinkman and Talk:Cookie Brinkman/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)