User talk:JTtheOG/Archive 6

New content for Microland Wikipedia page
Hi, I want to make some updates to the Microland page on wiki. How do I go about this? I have the new content ready. Can I send it to you for review? And if yes, how? Regards UshaMicroland (talk) 05:57, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, মোসাফির, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

2019 ACC Women's Basketball Tournament
Hi. I noticed that you marked this page as patrolled. I was about to ask that it be CSDed, but I realized I should talk to you first:


 * On December 31, the page was created (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:2019_ACC_Women%27s_Basketball_Tournament&oldid=876219587)
 * On January 2, I moved it to draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:2019_ACC_Women%27s_Basketball_Tournament&diff=876408881&oldid=876219604&diffmode=source)
 * On January 3, the same editor recreated the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_ACC_Women%27s_Basketball_Tournament&oldid=876651887)
 * On January 6, the same editor redirected the draft to the new article
 * An hour later, you marked the article as patrolled

The article that exists now is identical to the one I draftified (see comparison of the draft (before redirect) and the current article at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ComparePages?page1=2019+ACC+Women%27s+Basketball+Tournament&rev1=&page2=&rev2=876408894&action=&diffonly=&unhide=&diffmode=source). Accordingly, I would ask you to take another look at the page you patrolled, since I believe it is not ready for mainspace. I would mark it for CSD as a recreation of existing material (the draft) and say that I would R2 it, but I can't move it. --DannyS712 (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

WNBA Page Review
Hi JTtheOG, I've noticed you've reviewed a lot of the 2019 WNBA team season pages, but I didn't get a notification that the Connecticut Sun got reviewed. Would you mind double checking that it was reviewed? Thanks! swimmer33 13:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Just saw you reviewed it. Thanks! swimmer33 13:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NLE Choppa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birdman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/NLE_Choppa check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/NLE_Choppa?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18


Hello ,

, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
 * Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
 * Reliable Sources for NPP

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
 * Backlog drive coming soon


 * News
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.


 * Discussions of interest
 * A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
 * There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
 * What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 TFF First League
Hello. Can you review this page please? Draft:2019–20 TFF First League --Oltnilhn (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the reviews
Thanks for reviewing all of my LLGs of Papua New Guinea stubs! I've got many more coming this month. Today, another user tried to place CSD tags on several of them but later reverted his decisions. Just watch out for these reckless guys if you can. Sagotreespirit (talk) 03:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019


Hello ,

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important. Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR. The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever. NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so  you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations. Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for  the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging. Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * QUALITY of REVIEWING
 * Backlog
 * Move to draft
 * Notifying users
 * PERM
 * Other news

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop copying the same reference to each article
You are copying the Rolling Stone reference to every article with dmy date format, when it should be using mdy (that means month goes first, so "July 2, 2019", not "2 July 2019"). Please change this before using it on any more articles, then copy it and use that.  Ss  112   02:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Translation needed
Hi,

I noticed your username at Translators available. Will you please help with translation of the following text to English language which probably may be used to expand article on Illyrian languages:

En los Balcanes noroccidentales, donde tampoco hay un predominio cla-ro de ninguno de los dos haplogrupos, se asentaban las lenguas ilirias habla-das por una serie de tribus distintas. Los esfuerzos de muchos estudiosos del tema para establecer si el ilirio pertenecía al grupo centum o al satem han tenido como resultado la recopilación de un manojo de rasgos contradicto-rios, algunos de los cuales parecen apuntar en una dirección y otros en la contraria. En realidad no hay otro fundamento que su vecindad geográfica para suponer que todas las lenguas habladas en esa zona de los Balcanes pertenecieran a un mismo grupo dialectal.

Thanks in advance. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tarun Ghosh, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kaleen Plaza, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Murray Bedel, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 DGG ( talk ) 01:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Paola Souza
Hi JTtheOG! Thank you so much for improving the Paola Souza Wikipage, I was just wondering why you added Zapopan, Mexico as her birthplace? According to my sources she was born in Baja California.

--Silva Selva (talk) 19:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey! The source I used, from Xeu Deportes, is the only one I found that definitively say she was born in Zapopan. A lot of the others simply say Tijuana is her hometown or she is from Tijuana, but I didn't recall any saying she was born there. If I'm wrong, please feel free and edit the article with sources of your own. JTtheOG (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drakeo the Ruler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compton ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Drakeo_the_Ruler check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Drakeo_the_Ruler?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rebellion of Oaxaca, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

thank u!!
thank u for reviewing my blackhawks and golden knights pages!!!! ur the best!

HappyBoi3892 (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC) 


 * No problem, thank u for creating them my guy ! JTtheOG (talk) 01:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Club Always Ready, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nelson Cabrera and Alberto Pinto ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Club_Always_Ready check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Club_Always_Ready?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi JTtheOG....Thanks for the page Review, much appreciated.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 10:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

AfC reviewer
Thank you for applying. I've added you to the AfC reviewers list. Warmly, Lourdes 08:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oliver Ortíz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ensenada ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Oliver_Ort%C3%ADz check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Oliver_Ort%C3%ADz?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tres Barrera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tres_Barrera check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tres_Barrera?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello ,

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
 * Backlog

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
 * Coordinator

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for  making  the occasional  mistake while  others can learn from  their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
 * This month's refresher course

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
 * Deletion tags

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
 * Paid editing


 * Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
 * Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent  enhancements to  the New Pages Feed and  features in the Curation  tool, and there are still more to  come. Due to the wealth  of information  now displayed by  ORES, reviewers are strongly  encouraged to  use the system now rather than Twinkle; it  will  also  correctly  populate the logs.
 * Not English
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
 * Tools

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Would you be willing and able to review my first submission? (OG Cuicide)
Dear JT,

I submitted a page almost two months ago and it still says that it's waiting to be reviewed. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I'm not familiar with this process yet. I would love to become more involved and eventually put in the work to become a reviewer, but, until then, I figured I would just send someone a message and respectfully ask for assistance.

I hope this message reaches you. If you're unable to help me for whatever reason, please let me know what else I can do to have the page finalized.

Thanks for your time,

-Aaron Williams

Ace woe (talk) 23:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Simon Ilincev, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing
I would like to thank you for reviewing many articles about the nations which participate to Doha 2019. But to tell the truth I do not exactly know what it means. Because all these stubs are far from perfection (and there are some errors in them, because I have a very bad vision and a very small keyboard. Nevertheless if you could indicate how to review (and if it is just a quick review or a very complete one). Thanks in advance if you could help me to understand more how WP works (after 15 years as user).-Arorae (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cal State Northridge Matadors women's water polo players


A tag has been placed on Category:Cal State Northridge Matadors women's water polo players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cal State Northridge Matadors women's water polo


A tag has been placed on Category:Cal State Northridge Matadors women's water polo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cal State Northridge Matadors water polo


A tag has been placed on Category:Cal State Northridge Matadors water polo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello ,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. There are now holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action. Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays. Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox. Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards. Admin has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13. The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting the queue to 0
 * Coordinator
 * This month's refresher course
 * Tools
 * It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
 * It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
 * Reviewer Feedback
 * Second set of eyes
 * Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
 * Do be sure to have our talk page  on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
 * Arbitration Committee
 * Community Wish list

NLE Choppa
I saw your edit on NLE Choppa. Those songs such as Redrum & Thought Poetry he released as SINGLES on Apple Music and Spotify. And songs you removed such as Watch Out & Choppa DaVinci were released as SINGLES. Watch Out even got a video on WorldStarHipHop. Explain this, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2019AlwaysLit (talk • contribs) 13:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019


This year's Reviewer of the Year is. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
 * Reviewer of the Year

Special commendation again goes to who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to and  who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by.
 * Redirect autopatrol

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
 * Source Guide Discussion

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This month's refresher course

Cheers

 * Oh wow thank you! Wishing the best for you and your family this holiday season as well. JTtheOG (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

 * And all the same goes to you! Happy Holidays! JTtheOG (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck
 豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune. このミラPはJTtheOGたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！ フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE! ミラP 04:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi expatriate sportspeople in Wales


A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi expatriate sportspeople in Wales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)