User talk:JV672

August 2021
Hello, I'm ProofRobust. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Noahidism, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ProofRobust 17:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

I have a source to add. Can you please the programing language to insert a link for a source is JV672 (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Noahidism appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

I have sighted sources from the Anti Decimation League Wich is a globally recognized establishment and History Information.com that is a Non Religious Academic source. Please provide your statistics showing this is a minority opinion as the removal of the added content is considered to be promoting Anti-semtic views that violate many user agreements. Additionally the removal of the newly edited content will be reported to but not limited to those in authority with Google, the Anti Decimation League and other governing entire who support anti discrimination practices. Since I provided the edit please let me know if the newly provided content will be permitted now that there has been more clarity on the matter provided. Failure to reinstate the information provided will be documented in an effort to combat Antisemitism JV672 (talk) 21:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Please note the correction of the above typos generated by auto correct: it should state Governing entities vs entire and should state Anti Defamation League vs Decimation JV672 (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Timely reply from Editors
What amount of time is considered reasonable to allow an editor to respond to a dispute or provide sources not provided on the Wikipedia page to validate the editors decision on allowing content contributed to remain or to be removed. I understand editors are volunteers and that requires the understanding that immediate and timely responses may not happen. However is there a time limit and or policy that prevents editors from delaying a response to prevent progress or further discussion? An editor could simply not respond to prevent information sharing they disagree with and or dispute by simply claiming they are volunteer who was busy and aren't required to respond in certain timeframe. What if an editor takes weeks, months, years? Is there a regulation on this? JV672 (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)