User talk:JVbird/sandbox

JVbird's Peer Review
Below is a peer review critique of some of your work to date. Kudos on a nicely done job of posting this article to PM. There were a total of six edits listed in the history file; three edits by JVbird, two by Jules Carry, and one by Grlucas. The edits by Jules were minor edits citing corrections to citations and correction of a couple of typos. Grlucas edited a few tweaks. The timeframe to complete the task was met, having taken a total of four days for completion of the assignment.
 * Reviewed article history in PM, The Modern Dream-Vision: Freud's The Interpretation of Dreams and Mailer's An American Dream by Andrew Gordon and posted to PM by JVbird.
 * Reviewed letters posted to PM. By JVbird

An evaluation of the history of the letters posted by JVbird showed you may have had issues with formatting, citing, and linking relevant items. I would suggest reviewing the citation module training module to sharpen skill set.


 * Reviewed contributions to Norris Church Mailer BIO in PM by JVbird

An evaluation of the history shows you made quite a few contributions to editing Norris Church Mailer’s biography including editing for conciseness and organization of information in several sections, locating and fixing broken citations, and adding information to enhance writing in Early Life and Legacy.


 * Reviewed JVbird Sandbox

An evaluation of JVbird sandbox reflects JVbird’s ability to write fluently and effectively. His posts are numerous, meets the requirements of the class, and are quite detailed, entertaining, and informative. Although you are quite skilled at expressing written content, you should continue work on editing for conciseness and relevancy.

I sincerely hope you find my evaluation of your work helpful.Dillbug (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the feedback! You are on the money with my needing to work on conciseness. I made a conscious effort in the our last class to not have so many compound, complex sentences, to instead adjust my style so that it was more appropriate to professional writing, rather than academic writing. I reverted back in the Journal for this class (although I thought it allowed for more personal style) and I found myself struggling to be more concise with the discussion topics and even in the bio work. I'll keep working on that for sure. I'm still struggling with exactly what you noted, with linking, citing, and formatting, although I hope I'm getting better. Great advice, Sandy, and I really appreciate it. JVbird (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)