User talk:J 2da me

The Green Effect
I have added a "" template to the article The Green Effect, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 18:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Also, please see WP:CRYSTAL. There is no guarantee that this film would be made; studios have already rejected his script, and there's no telling at this point if it will be picked up later. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 18:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand what you say. Should we not wait a month for Night to comment on the progress of this film? Then if it is scrapped the page can be removed.


 * It was only a few days ago that the latest press statement was released for this film. So it is possible that there will be regular updates, thus echoing the need for this page.


 * No, the issue is that the film is not guaranteed to be made. Scripts are written all the time and are never picked up.  There's been articles that have said Shyamalan's credibility is low after Lady in the Water, so The Green Effect may not even be his next film.  Ideally, film articles should begin when a production start date is announced -- that's what I did for Wanted not too long ago.  If you're concerned about keeping up to date with the project, I'm already storing headlines at User:Erikster/Future articles.  I just think it's too soon to create a film article when there is still a strong chance that the script may not be picked up and developed by any studio. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 18:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * To further my point, I'm not saying that the script shouldn't be mentioned at all. However, you're creating a film article where there may be no film to be had.  I'm fine with information about the script being on Shyamalan's article (as I saw that you added), but until the making of the film is guaranteed, it's overkill to create an entire film article for it.  Hope that makes sense. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 18:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)