User talk:J Albert 31

Proposed deletion of Scott Samuel


The article Scott Samuel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and no evidence of satisfying WP:BIO."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you. I read that WPBIO when I started my research and editing. I know that and kept it in consideration. If you see on WPBIO it states that People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Here every published source is independent of the subject and is reliable. It's mostly pre-internet so maybe it seems less notable but Forbes, Inc, ecomercebytes, and books are independent references. Here is a link to some more books, [|link]


 * Secondly, WP:AUTHOR in WPBIO says
 * The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
 * The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.


 * You can read about that in the article that he originated a significant new concept, or technique. So, I request you to please recheck and I'll visit archive center that may have some newspaper cuttings available that I'll upload as references. J Albert 31 (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert J. McCarthy


A tag has been placed on Robert J. McCarthy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Robert J. McCarthy) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Robert J. McCarthy.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 19:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)