User talk:J Greb/Archive Feb 2013

Project
How is the batman article relevant to LGBT wikiproject? Pass a Method  talk  00:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Very short version: Batman.
 * Even with Homosexuality in the Batman franchise, it is reasonable that WP:LGBT has an interest in the parent article.
 * - J Greb (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Micro film categories
Hi, at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_January_19 you nominated various small cats for deletion. The multiple upmerges are nearly finished. Now that RED films were upmerged into Category:Films based on Wildstorm titles, giving it 4 members, I'm inclined to keep that one after all; would you object? – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Given the outcome of the not-quite-micro categories, not, that sounds like it fits the current schema. - J Greb (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Chris Claremont photo
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the discussion on whether to include a 1990s photograph of Chris Claremont in his article? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice
As a veteran WikiProject Comics editor, you're invited to a discussion at Talk:Marvel ReEvolution. --Tenebrae (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Odie5533 (talk) 11:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:WW104.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:WW104.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Mutant (Marvel Comics)
Hello J Greb,

I noticed you fully protected Mutant (Marvel Comics) 18 December 2011, with a summary "Fan padding in-univers minutia (Omega level mutants)"  I was wondering if you would be willing to change it to pending changes (level one) or if you feel it is necessary (an IAR case of level two) since it has been over a year with full protection? Crazynast 20:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * IIRC at the time the padding wasn't limited to just IPs or new editors. Looking at the sporadic edit requests, that seems to have changes.
 * I've got no problem with it dropping to the lower protection, the only caveat being that if the fan parade of "gotta name'em all, even the guesses" starts up again, the more stringent lock goes back on.
 * - J Greb (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Crazynast 23:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aquaman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Your recent editing history at Template:Black Canary shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.


 * Thank you - J Greb (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Adding Max Charles to Spider-Man in film cast and character list
Another editor recently started a discussion about your recent edit, and I thought I'd point it out to you because I know you're busy. Spidey 104  20:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

It'd be great if you'd respond to the discussion!--Oskars Čaikovskis (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Catwoman
by BOLD, revert, discuss cycle standards I gave you a few days to add to the discussion and you neglected to, I'm sorry if it wasn't enough time, but by the end of the discussion on the talk page I thought I got the point across and went ahead and adding to and edited it, trying to improve the navbox. - Shallowgravy (talk) 03:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh you've made your POV clear. You just did not show that there is a consensus for it.
 * 'That is the important part of BRD, not just explaining yourself. Also keep in mind that silence is not the same as acquiescence.
 * - J Greb (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Just wondering...
But is there a standing "speedy delete" on categories like Category:Fictional characters with red hair?

- J Greb (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi. My apologies for the late response (real life has been interfering with my wiki time : (


 * To answer your question, no to speedy, but when nominating it at CFD, you could note WP:OC. Categories meeting one or more OC criteria have a long history of being deleted.
 * I hope this helps. - jc37 16:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)