User talk:J S DHAMI

Welcome!
It's my pleasure that I am the member of Wikipedia team and contribute to it J S DHAMI (talk) 09:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

It's my pleasure that I am the member of Wikipedia team and contribute to it. J S DHAMI (talk) 09:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Not adhering to a neutral point of view; original research
Hi ,

thank you very much for expanding the article about Chhiplakot. I was concerned about the quality of the contributions and your insistence to add a personal name as a reference to the article, even after another user had reverted your addition (edit warring). For this reason, I had blocked you from editing for two minutes, but then reconsidered the situation: You're an enthusiastic new editor and have never been warned about the issue. Also, I must not block users if I am involved in a content dispute with them, and I have now decided to improve the article instead of acting in an administrative role. The block was unnecessary; I'm sorry for the harsh response.

Most of the text appears to be about religious beliefs; while I'm impressed by the amount of detail that went into these descriptions, I have removed them for now. This is because the religious beliefs of the local population are probably not relevant enough to warrant such focus on them throughout the article. We call this problem "undue weight".

Sadly, some of your text also appears to be original research. Wikipedia does not publish original research; Wikipedia is a tertiary source that mostly summarizes what reliable secondary sources say about a subject. See WP:PSTS for details about primary, secondary and tertiary sources, the difference between them, and concerns about their reliability.

Please take care to write from a neutral point of view. Whether you find something beautiful or not is irrelevant; the encyclopedia should only contain objective, factual descriptions.

Thank you very much and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Anita5192. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Calculus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — Anita5192 (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Pratap Chandra Sarangi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 13:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Any unblock should be contingent on a convincing explanation as to why you removed sourced text at Kurukshetra War‎ you removed sourced text calling it "added information'. Doug Weller  talk 13:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)