User talk:J Van Hamburg

Dacia Duster/ARO 10
This text written by you "(...) As is typical of some Wikipedia editors they failed to make clear that previously the Duster was a badge engineered ARO 10 sold as the Dacia Duster in several European countries . These ommissions and innacuracies [sic] make research and thus the preservation of older vehicles harder." is not acceptable. Article space should not be used to editorialise in order to raise concerns about the content. Even less for whining and including attacks to fellow editors. If you have comments about the content, please post them in the article's talk page. The article had already a section covering the former use of the name, and I added further coments on the lead paras. In any case, the current text follows the majority of sources, as they do not consider this Dacia Duster a "second generation" or a "successor" to the ARO 10. Dacia or its parent company Renault do not recall some form of relationship either, even if the ARO 10 perhaps influenced the name choosing. It is not important what we think we know, we need to follow sources. In fact, there already is a separate article covering the ARO 10 in the English Wikipedia if you want check it out. As Dacia's Dacia Duster and the ARO's Dacia Duster are unrelated vehicles, we apply WP:COMMONNAME as most reliable sources call the Dacia vehicle "Dacia Duster" and the ARO vehicle "ARO 10". Also, Dacia's Dacia Duster is the vehicle most people associate with the name, as the ARO 10 was a low-volume model that was never a sales success. --Urbanoc (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)