User talk:J is me

I only blanked those messages hoping that some editor will revert them because this is on their watchlist and that they will read the below message.

Okay it is finished entirely now
I am no longer going to add nonsense to the talk pages of this encyclopedia and the beareaucratic pages that I disagree with. I feel that whatever point I had about being incorrectly banned has become twisted and pointless to continue. I regard Wikipedia as an excellent resource. I also regard it as an excellent social venture that I have failed almost entirely.

From this time forward I will discontinue actions to specific user's talk pages. i.e. Snottygobble et alia

The reasons I started trolling in the first place and any purposeless excuses I may have deemed to have for my actions are not worth commenting on. The simple fact is that I might have continued editing from a new i.d. in an entirely uncontroversial manner but I chose otherwise to get attention for a meaningless purpose. The reason for Wikipedia's existence is to create a comphrehensive and relatively free resource for humanity not to pander to my eccentricities.

Furthermore I apologise for the actions and the irritability they have caused particular administraters blocking and reverting i.e. Curps Snottygobble Ambi CambridgeBayWeather etc. (and those who I cannot remember).

I feel a deep sense of personal shame that my actions and their consequences have caused considerable disadvantage for others who seek to use the public computers for motives far higher than mine.

I pledge not to create a J is me et alia spawn again as evidence of this. I hope that the administraters involved will therefore view the i.p. block as unneccessary and preventative only of good edits being made by others.

Please, I implore you to trial it, I promise no vandalism or trolling will occur at all on my front and trust that no other editors will provoke a banning.

I also promise, that if I ever do return, I will not make an edit to do with football in Australia ever again and that I will follow the rules to the exact dot(or the best and most honest interpretation).

If however, you deem me incapable of editing honestly and uncontroversially (I would like an oppurtunity to prove otherwise) than I will not make another edit.

Thankyou for reading this message and I hope you take into consideration to unblock the public i.d. that better people hope to use.

Yours sincerely J is me 13:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I saw this and I have left my comments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Community ban for Licinius. I am willing to give you another chance as long as you behave and ID all the sockpuppets. I am curious why you picked this one and not the original Licinius? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeBayWeather (talk • contribs)

Thankyou for helping me. As for identifying sockpuppets, that is a pretty good roundup done by the administraters. The net is too big in some places and too small in others. Like I who have sinned was a silly name i used to add something and I know there are more but I cannot remember them. Others on that list were not me at all like Grazznada and must of been caught because they used the ip numbers I have used. Some I think were copycats or something, or people I know having fun(not at your expense at mine).

As to your second question... it is irrelevant either way... and this would take this discussion to the actual reasons I feel wronged which I have no purpose of discussing. Just awaiting the punishment and hopefully the unblocking of the i.p. numbers.

J is me 02:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

As Further Evidence
As further evidence of my good faith I will note the following for those who are still claiming that NSWelshman is my sockpuppet(he is not). These edist led me to believe that user: Factoid Killer and user: NSWelshman are in fact the same person. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Australian_rules_football#Another_example_of_out_of_control_non-NPOV has the user: Factoid Killer making remarks about popularity. This user disappears for a couple of retorts[] and is instead the i.p. number 62.254.168.102, who later caused this identity to be banned []. This i.p. number later confessed to being NSWelshman and Jimididit as well as Jebus Christ. 62.254.168.102 [] also edited the user page of Factoid Killer on 21st November 2005. It should be noted as well that later this same ip number added a sockpuppet tag to his userpage. Factoid Killer has also edited a user page [] of a known sockpuppet of NSWelshman, Jimididit. Factoid Killer made the same edits that NSWelshman would later make to the page. It should be noted that both sockpuppets voted [].

I give this information entirely as evidence of my good faith and as evidence that I want to now help work towards the cessation of disruptive sockpuppeting. I have no idea how this evidence might be treated but I do think it is relevant to proving that I can have a constructive purpose on this encyclopedia. Yours sincerely J is me 07:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello
'''Was this offer accepted or refused?

I am not sure what is going on????'''

J is me 09:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)