User talk:Jaakko Häkkinen~enwiki

Anatolia
Hi, I opened a thread on the talk page of the above article to discuss your edit here, and thought you might like to be aware of it. DeCausa (talk) 10:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Looking further at this, I've noticed two aspects I wanted to check with you: (1) the work appears to be published on your own page of a hosting site. Is that correct? If so, it's likely that it won't qualify as a reliable source in Wikipedia terms. It would be good if you could clarify this. (2) Looking at your contrib. history, many (perhaps most) of your edits involve adding citations of your own work to articles. You clearly have academic expertise in the field of Uralic languages and Wikipedia needs subject experts to contribute. But Wikipedia also needs to protect itself from people using the site for self-promotion. I'm not suggesting that you are - but it may be helpful if you provide some explanation of the notoriety of your work. There is a specific Wikipedia policy on self-citing which is as follows:
 * Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest. Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason, but only if it is relevant and conforms to the content policies, particularly WP:SELFPUB. Excessive self-citation is strongly discouraged. When in doubt, defer to the community's opinion.  In any case,  citations should be in the third person and should not place undue emphasis on your work,  giving proper due to the work of others as in a review article.
 * Perhaps you could comment on how your self-citing complies with this. Thanks.
 * DeCausa (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd like to express my full support to Jaakko Häkkinen on this. СЛУЖБА (talk) 02:48, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Just fine. It fulfills all the criteria in my view. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow, thank you very much! :) --Jaakko Häkkinen (talk) 08:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

your these
Forget PIE, check old East germanic (gothic) <-> Estonian IE *bheh1 -(ye/o-) → U *pexi - ‘to cook’(Koivulehto 1991) Modern GER Bäcker ‘Baker’ GER *bakir Ur-GER *paeki → U *pexi ‘to cook’ Modern GER backen ‘baking’ GER *baka[n] Ur-GER *paeka → U *peša ‘to cook’ p → b Fatyanovo-Balanovo Culture is influenced with germanic TRB->eastly CWC (first baltic expansion) Poltavka Culture and middle volga culture is influence from germanic GAC (2300 BC at middle volga) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.159.60.30 (talk) 18:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Proto-Uralic homeland hypotheses
In the discussion page of Proto-Uralic homeland hypotheses there is a comment waiting. (And see also the last edits of the article itself. As far as I can see as a lay person, the significance of the current consensus should not be underestimated and there may even be sources for the view that such consensus exists, by, for example, Juha Janhunen. But as a lay person I will not try formulate anything about this in the article namespace.) --Urjanhai (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Sadovszky's Cal-Ugrian hypothesis
Jaakko,

Thanks for your comments at Talk:Otto_von_Sadovszky. I've expanded the article somewhat, and added some new section headers, including one called "Cal-Ugrian theory" and a bolded subtitle "Criticism" under that. I understand your Talk comments and replied there. I'd like to add something to the "Criticism" section that faithfully represents the thrust of your explanation (which appear to be the majority opinion by far) that I can reference to a source (other than the vague comments in his obit that his theories weren't "well-accepted"). Can you suggest a couple of sources I could use, or some places I could try to find such? Thanks. Mathglot (talk) 01:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jaakko Häkkinen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jaakko Häkkinen~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 14:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)