User talk:Jaardon

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 15:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page
Luckily for me, user pages aren't part of the encyclop&#0230;dia; I can fully indulge in my colloquially-styled grammar rulez. :P - CobaltBlueTony 14:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Your disapproval of other peoples work
HI I've noticed you mock the work of others in your edit summaries. Fine think the articles and other editiors are poor but please refrain from doing it in edit summaries. Thankyou. Dr. Blofeld      White cat

Re: My Disapproval

 * Thank you for your comments, I appreciate you taking the time to help me out. I agree that my condescending comments were somewhat out of line and I apologize. It's just that lazy and carelessly written English annoys me, and some days I'm just not in a tolerating mood. I only counted 5 of my last 50 edits to be "mocking" and maybe two or three in the previous 200 edits. I'll try to keep my disapproval out of my edit summaries in the future. -Jaardon (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Not to worry, we both know that a high number of articles are pretty diabolical but as the article improves when you look back in the editing history it does stand out negatively thats all. Admittedly there are times when I feel like screaming on here at dumb additions and playschool level English in some places but I think it to myself silently. If you just say "Rewording badly written phrase" or "improving section" that should be absolutely fine. Regards. Dr. Blofeld      White cat 17:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Aurora (Sleeping Beauty), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Pamzeis (talk) 07:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)