User talk:Jabdul1234

February 2022
Hello, I'm Kpddg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jonathan Wheatley without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kpddg  (talk  •  contribs)  16:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jonathan Wheatley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!🗣) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  17:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

While your edit summary does say that the section is, "its false, biased, inaccurate, based on a fan interpretation and devoid of facts", removing the page entirely is a response that could easily provoke a edit war. A way that you could avoid this is to discuss the potential removal of the content on the talk page of the article. Furthermore, most people would view your edit summary as not obeying wp:NPOV. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!🗣) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜)  17:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jonathan Wheatley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. twsabin 17:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)