User talk:Jach19

June 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Gran Canaria Airport does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Jetstreamer $Talk$ 21:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to TAP Air Portugal, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 01:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Sunwing Airlines
I know WP:ALFC but you should write that those aircrafts are wet-leased in notes, not removing them because they’re still using them for transportation. Cheers. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

The table is for aircraft registered to the airline in question if they are wet leased they are not registered, operated or owned by the airline so they should not be included in the table. Also the aircraft you've added aren't even in the table reference provided or don't have a reference and planespotters is not a reliable reference, that is not a personal choice. Jach19 (talk) 10:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Removing information that didn’t include wet leasing
Id like to inform you that removing information that has been correctly added is a violation of Wikipedia rules. Airline7375 (talk) 23:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Luxor International Airport. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Charles (talk) 08:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)