User talk:Jack27

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Spanish; did you know there is a Spanish Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Welcome!

¡Hola, bienvenido a Wikipedia! Si bien todos los esfuerzos para mejorar la Wikipedia son bien recibidos, su nivel de inglés no parece idóneo para hacer contribuciones de utilidad. ¿Sabía que existe una Wikipedia en español? Quizás prefiera contribuir ahí. De cualquier forma, reciba la más cordial bienvenida a Wikipedia y nuestro agradecimiento por esforzarse. Si necesita ayuda, puede notificármelo en mi página de discusión. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ¡Bienvenido!

Proposed deletion of Papers from an unemployed person


The article Papers from an unemployed person has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Does not come close to meeting any of the five criteria for book notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mathglot (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Memoria viva de la transición


The article Memoria viva de la transición has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Does not come close to meeting any of the five criteria for book notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hi (Mathglot) This article corresponds to a review to one of the books of the Spanish politician and president of the government Leopoldo Calvo-Sotelo (Jack27)

Nomination of Memoria viva de la transición for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Memoria viva de la transición is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Memoria viva de la transición until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi (Mathglot) This article corresponds to a review to one of the books of the Spanish politician and president of the government Leopoldo Calvo-Sotelo (Jack27)

Nomination of Papers from an unemployed person for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papers from an unemployed person is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Papers from an unemployed person until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi (Mathglot) This article corresponds to a review to one of the books of the Spanish politician and president of the government Leopoldo Calvo-Sotelo (Jack27)

Proposed deletion of On External Transition


The article On External Transition has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Reads like a book review, no indication of book itself meeting WP:BOOK criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi (Mathglot) This article corresponds to a review to one of the books of the Spanish politician and president of the government Leopoldo Calvo-Sotelo (Jack27)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Memoria viva de la transición. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 09:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Papers from an unemployed person. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 09:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of On External Transition for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On External Transition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/On External Transition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Warning
Hi, Jack27. It's nice to see you here in en:wiki, but refrain from pulling the changes in the Marco article over and over again. Go to the talk page to discuss the changes, because the changes you pulled on the article are highly problematic, not the least because the absence of (secondary) sources. Regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)