User talk:Jack5160

Keep these TDS suffering trolls off here.

Jack, quit being a commie stooge. Her pictures fairly point to a woman calling for extermination in a Nazi-like way.

Use of edit summaries
Hi! Regarding the use of edit summaries, it may not be a good idea to insult other editors. Please see the policy WP:NPA.

Sdrqaz (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Ann Telnaes. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NJD-DE (talk) 20:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hockeycatcat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Republican Party (United States) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at New Democrats shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. POLITANVM talk 05:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

DS Alert
Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 09:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at New Democrats. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
POLITANVM talk 19:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)