User talk:Jack7-10

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * There is years of work in this article, and you're just undoing it contrary to policy or consensus. If you want to make major changes, please discuss them first on the talk page. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Luke Gell
A tag has been placed on Luke Gell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Chapswoth Estate
A tag has been placed on The Chapswoth Estate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If you read the article Shameless, you'll find it's the Chatsworth Estate, named after the stately home in Derbyshire; and is in itself insufficiently notable to warrant an article in its own right. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with Rodhullandemu that the subject does not appear to warrant a separate article. However, I think it does not quite fit the criteria for speedy deletion.  So, I've changed it to a proposed deletion instead - you can read about the process at WP:PROD.  Feel free to ask questions.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Luke Gell
A tag has been placed on Luke Gell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 02:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * In short, no. While your enthusiasm is welcome, you have to realise the difference between a blog, a fanzine, and an encyclopedia, which is where we are now. I'm sure Luke Gell has acted before and will act in the future; but whatever goes into Wikipedia has to be supported by reliable and verifiable sources. It is not good enough here to put in "things you know", because other people need to be able to check these out independently. Put it this way: if you are at school, which I guess you are, and are asked to write an essay or do some homework about, say, Australia, your teacher or lecturer will want to know where you got the information, and it's your responsibility to provide it, otherwise whatever you say won't be taken seriously; and that is not just limited to school, because you'll find it applies when you get a job out there as well. If you can't back up your statements with some evidence, which is what people will be looking for, you won't get very far, and I think you could do better than that, if you want to spare some time making the effort. As I said, you are keen to contribute here, but you should take a little time to learn some basic rules. I haven't been here that long, and have broken the rules myself; but now I know them, mostly. I took the time to learn them, because if I hadn't, I knew I wouldn't last here very long. Now, there as "admins" and "sysops" here who are probably younger than you; the youngest I know is 13, but he's a respected contributor, and has the ability to block users from editing, prevent pages from being edited by anyone, and alongside that, writes articles which are full of useful information. Now maybe we haven't got off to a great start here, because we see a lot of people here who leap straight in, get it wrong, and are told off from day one. Don't be put off editing by that, just please take some time to learn some rules, and if you need any help, ask me on my talk page. Best wishes.-- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 02:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

The Chapswoth Estate
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article The Chapswoth Estate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

"Shameless" articles
Please do not create articles on the Shameless housing estate, pub etc. These can be adequately covered in Shameless. I don't believe there are sufficient sources or enough encyclopedic material to warrant seperate articles. --kingboyk (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Luke Gell
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Luke Gell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Michael Rapaport.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Michael Rapaport.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Michael-rapaport1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Michael-rapaport1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)