User talk:JackSmith15

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Donald Glover has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Donald Glover was changed by JackSmith15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930723 on 2016-02-18T15:47:55+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Walker. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Luke Walker was changed by JackSmith15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912452 on 2016-02-18T16:30:25+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of Luke walker mjhs


A tag has been placed on Luke walker mjhs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Iago Qnsi (talk) 18:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luke Walker mjhs
Hello JackSmith15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Luke Walker mjhs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Julietdeltalima  (talk)  18:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm TheFrog001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jeff Brohm, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheFrog001 - Talk to me! 16:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)