User talk:JackTaskerUK

Galactology
The theory of Galactology comes from neither an Atheist or Theist; but an Agnostic. I am Called Jack Tasker, and while understanding how a star can have a life span; i chose to conect this to the elements, molecules and solutions that create our world, our galaxy and our planet. You could say life has to involve an 'Organic substance' or you could say it exists for any object made of living cells or so called 'lifeless' materials. I believe that an substance has a life span for as long as it remains to have a certain chemical formulae. This is not my theory about Galactology just an insight into my way of thinking, which may help you understand how my Ideological Thinking develops.

Galactology

To understand the universe you must understand that when connecting the life span of a galaxy to the time that the universe has been expanding, for this argument numbers are not important; the ratios help us unlock the theory. So for my argument lets pretend that the universe has been expanding for 100 years, whilst the lifespan of a galaxy is 1 year. Then imagine that there are 100 galaxy's in the universe today. Whilst the possibility of a Galaxy containing life is represented by 1 in every 1000 galaxies. Therefore at this moment there are only about 100 galaxies in the universe so there is a lower chance that one contains life, but if you consider there have been 10,000 galaxies that have existed since the Universe began expanding. Therefore from the prediction based on ratio there have been 10 galaxys with the existence of life possible or definite.

I can learn from this theory that 10 galaxy's have existed which may of contained basic or technologically advanced life, whilst they may have died just like a star; they are influential in understanding our planet. It could also mean that every discovery we make, every idea we conclude and every achievement we consider unique; may have been done before. The theory could also show that the Life in each universe would have had a definite ending that they could not survive, as they may have been around long enough to travel at the maximum speed known that an organic matter can travel been the speed of light. This may not have been fast enough to travel outside the edges of their Galaxy; you could say they were maybe not doomed but constricted in time. This to me is a way that god may have played a part. As if only one galaxy with life forms has survived at a time, we may find a reason for this in the future. once each life dies out in a single Galaxy, its inhabitants pass their soul or 'Life force' to begin in another planet.

I do not mean this to make Galactology appear as unreliable and viewed in the same highly unbelievable light as 'Scientology' but this has been written at an early stage of its development, and i am only connecting my ideas about consequences and beliefs to this theory. This is why it may seem more theory and almost fiction; but as we have less of an intellect on Galaxy's far closer to the point of expansion or even Galaxies that have since deceased.

This may be proved by radio waves transmitted by the form of life on other galaxy's, as we have developed them there is nothing to say someone or something else hasn't. Therefore as radio waves don't generally disperse in a vacuum (as is space) they can travel almost infinite distances. However we have only been looking for radio waves for a 100 years, which is absolutely nothing in the scheme of the existence of the universe.

I believe in other phrases that i have developed to illustrate my idea and understanding. If everything is matter then everything matters If science is only trying to disproved, it has proved by its own laws of reliability it cannot prove anything Your heart keeps beating whilst knowing it cannot beat for ever, but your brain questions its meaning. Do not follow you brain its thinking, but for how long?

I would appreciate your input as my understanding is a grasp at my knowledge, as I am only 16 years of age this is little. However I hope that the basis is correct, I require scientific knowledge to concise it and improve its scientific accuracy/precision.JackTaskerUK (talk) 15:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Galactology


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Galactology, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meph talk 15:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Galactology
The theory of Galactology comes from neither an Atheist or Theist; but an Agnostic. I am Called Jack Tasker, and while understanding how a star can have a life span; i chose to conect this to the elements, molecules and solutions that create our world, our galaxy and our planet. You could say life has to involve an 'Organic substance' or you could say it exists for any object made of living cells or so called 'lifeless' materials. I believe that an substance has a life span for as long as it remains to have a certain chemical formulae. This is not my theory about Galactology just an insight into my way of thinking, which may help you understand how my Ideological Thinking develops. Galactology To understand the universe you must understand that when connecting the life span of a galaxy to the time that the universe has been expanding, for this argument numbers are not important; the ratios help us unlock the theory. So for my argument lets pretend that the universe has been expanding for 100 years, whilst the lifespan of a galaxy is 1 year. Then imagine that there are 100 galaxy's in the universe today. Whilst the possibility of a Galaxy containing life is represented by 1 in every 1000 galaxies. Therefore at this moment there are only about 100 galaxies in the universe so there is a lower chance that one contains life, but if you consider there have been 10,000 galaxies that have existed since the Universe began expanding. Therefore from the prediction based on ratio there have been 10 galaxys with the existence of life possible or definite. I can learn from this theory that 10 galaxy's have existed which may of contained basic or technologically advanced life, whilst they may have died just like a star; they are influential in understanding our planet. It could also mean that every discovery we make, every idea we conclude and every achievement we consider unique; may have been done before. The theory could also show that the Life in each universe would have had a definite ending that they could not survive, as they may have been around long enough to travel at the maximum speed known that an organic matter can travel been the speed of light. This may not have been fast enough to travel outside the edges of their Galaxy; you could say they were maybe not doomed but constricted in time. This to me is a way that god may have played a part. As if only one galaxy with life forms has survived at a time, we may find a reason for this in the future. once each life dies out in a single Galaxy, its inhabitants pass their soul or 'Life force' to begin in another planet. I do not mean this to make Galactology appear as unreliable and viewed in the same highly unbelievable light as 'Scientology' but this has been written at an early stage of its development, and i am only connecting my ideas about consequences and beliefs to this theory. This is why it may seem more theory and almost fiction; but as we have less of an intellect on Galaxy's far closer to the point of expansion or even Galaxies that have since deceased. This may be proved by radio waves transmitted by the form of life on other galaxy's, as we have developed them there is nothing to say someone or something else hasn't. Therefore as radio waves don't generally disperse in a vacuum (as is space) they can travel almost infinite distances. However we have only been looking for radio waves for a 100 years, which is absolutely nothing in the scheme of the existence of the universe. I believe in other phrases that i have developed to illustrate my idea and understanding. If everything is matter then everything matters If science is only trying to disproved, it has proved by its own laws of reliability it cannot prove anything Your heart keeps beating whilst knowing it cannot beat for ever, but your brain questions its meaning. Do not follow you brain its thinking, but for how long? I would appreciate your input as my understanding is a grasp at my knowledge, as I am only 16 years of age this is little. However I hope that the basis is correct, I require scientific knowledge to concise it and improve its scientific accuracy/precision

Galactology
The theory of Galactology comes from neither an Atheist or Theist; but an Agnostic. I am Called Jack Tasker, and while understanding how a star can have a life span; i chose to conect this to the elements, molecules and solutions that create our world, our galaxy and our planet. You could say life has to involve an 'Organic substance' or you could say it exists for any object made of living cells or so called 'lifeless' materials. I believe that an substance has a life span for as long as it remains to have a certain chemical formulae. This is not my theory about Galactology just an insight into my way of thinking, which may help you understand how my Ideological Thinking develops. Galactology To understand the universe you must understand that when connecting the life span of a galaxy to the time that the universe has been expanding, for this argument numbers are not important; the ratios help us unlock the theory. So for my argument lets pretend that the universe has been expanding for 100 years, whilst the lifespan of a galaxy is 1 year. Then imagine that there are 100 galaxy's in the universe today. Whilst the possibility of a Galaxy containing life is represented by 1 in every 1000 galaxies. Therefore at this moment there are only about 100 galaxies in the universe so there is a lower chance that one contains life, but if you consider there have been 10,000 galaxies that have existed since the Universe began expanding. Therefore from the prediction based on ratio there have been 10 galaxys with the existence of life possible or definite. I can learn from this theory that 10 galaxy's have existed which may of contained basic or technologically advanced life, whilst they may have died just like a star; they are influential in understanding our planet. It could also mean that every discovery we make, every idea we conclude and every achievement we consider unique; may have been done before. The theory could also show that the Life in each universe would have had a definite ending that they could not survive, as they may have been around long enough to travel at the maximum speed known that an organic matter can travel been the speed of light. This may not have been fast enough to travel outside the edges of their Galaxy; you could say they were maybe not doomed but constricted in time. This to me is a way that god may have played a part. As if only one galaxy with life forms has survived at a time, we may find a reason for this in the future. once each life dies out in a single Galaxy, its inhabitants pass their soul or 'Life force' to begin in another planet. I do not mean this to make Galactology appear as unreliable and viewed in the same highly unbelievable light as 'Scientology' but this has been written at an early stage of its development, and i am only connecting my ideas about consequences and beliefs to this theory. This is why it may seem more theory and almost fiction; but as we have less of an intellect on Galaxy's far closer to the point of expansion or even Galaxies that have since deceased. This may be proved by radio waves transmitted by the form of life on other galaxy's, as we have developed them there is nothing to say someone or something else hasn't. Therefore as radio waves don't generally disperse in a vacuum (as is space) they can travel almost infinite distances. However we have only been looking for radio waves for a 100 years, which is absolutely nothing in the scheme of the existence of the universe. I believe in other phrases that i have developed to illustrate my idea and understanding. If everything is matter then everything matters If science is only trying to disproved, it has proved by its own laws of reliability it cannot prove anything Your heart keeps beating whilst knowing it cannot beat for ever, but your brain questions its meaning. Do not follow you brain its thinking, but for how long? I would appreciate your input as my understanding is a grasp at my knowledge, as I am only 16 years of age this is little. However I hope that the basis is correct, I require scientific knowledge to concise it and improve its scientific accuracy/precision

May 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Galactology, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Meph talk 17:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but this is not the place for original theories or research. Please do not continue to post this material either here on your user page or on the article space. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)