User talk:JackWhovian

Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) was changed by JackWhovian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877526 on 2023-05-13T22:07:12+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hailey Bieber, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Marita Camacho Quirós, you may be blocked from editing. ''I reinsered citations. This information is not cited elsewhere in the article, & removing the citations would expose this information to removal as uncited material. Please refrain from this, especially as it could violate WP:BLP.'' Peaceray (talk) 17:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials). Removing valid citations because WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST violates English Wikipedia policy. Peaceray (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at James Dyson. Insufficient explanation of removing references. Peaceray (talk) 17:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Dewsbury. ''Insufficient explanation for removing references. Another editor has already restored them..'' Peaceray (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Infoboxes
It's pointless to put information in an infobox if it doesn't conform to parameter requirements. If you bother to actually look at the results of your edits, you'll see that this edit did not change the infobox. It unnecessarily clutters the infobox and wastes everyone's time having to clean up after you. Please stop. Don't edit infoboxes if you don't know what you're doing. Sundayclose (talk) 18:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

STOP making unsourced edits. Last chance. You can already be blocked. One more unsourced edit and you will be.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Linda Larkin. Sundayclose (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Banned
Welcome back WelshDragon. You know fine well that you're permanently banned and should not have returned here under a new account. Jkaharper (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
User:Beeblebrox, how's it going? It's been a while! Listen, you blocked User:Jack M E 01 from article space for a refusal to communicate; well, this account is a CU match. In addition, User:Jkaharper, who's been here even longer than I have, thinks it's a sock of Sockpuppet investigations/WelshDragon18/Archive--is that right, Jkaharper? I can't confirm that, but it seems possible. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, pretty confident this is him. The editing patterns/frequency, editing style, and the topics edited (longevity related persons, Doctor Who/Torchwood articles, British soaps) are pretty much identical. --Jkaharper (talk) 02:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The behavioral evidence is pretty strong on its own, I'd say if CU shows a match, that's about as confirmed as it ever gets. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Confirmation and apology
Hey, guys

I just wanted to confirm that I am in fact User:Jack M E 01. I created this account because my first one was blocked and still wanted to make changes. I have autism and occasionally have wreckless impulses to want to change things that I view as being wrong.

Again, I humbly apologise and regret my actions.

Yours sincerely

Jack Evans JackWhovian (talk) 09:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)