User talk:Jack "Jim "Johnson

January 2023
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that in this edit to The Reader Magazine, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * K thx :) Jack &#34;Jim &#34;Johnson (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Behe, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Creation Museum, you may be blocked from editing. Bennv123 (talk) 09:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored
A couple of edit summaries by you, here and here, imply that Wikipedia needs to avoid offence. No, avoiding offence is not a rule or policy here; see WP:NOTCENSORED. Please do not remove encyclopedic content for such reasons. Bishonen &#124; tålk 14:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC).

February 2024
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Grey alien, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd  (talk)  00:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)