User talk:Jack Cox/archive1

Welcome!
Hi Jack Cox, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 17:54, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Elections charts
Great work on the 39th election candidates, Jack! Since you are interested in elections charts, I'd like your views on a colour project that I've initiated at Talk:Canadian federal election results since 1867 Thanks. I’d like to get some consensus on what to do about colours in the elections charts, but I don’t want to get into a revert war, so I’ve asked people for their ideas before any changes are made. Some of the colours that are currently being used are too dark for some monitors so that it is difficult to read the text. The point of adding colours to the charts is to make it easier for readers to derive information from the charts. This goal is foiled by using colours dark enough to obscure the text. The Wikipedia style guide is clear on the issue:


 * Use colour sparingly. Computers and browsers vary: you cannot know how much colour is presented on the recipient's machine if any. Wikipedia is international: colours have different meaning in different cultures. Too many colours on one page make them look cluttered and unencyclopedic. Use the colour red only for alerts and warnings.

Several people have suggested their ideas. Three specific proposals have been made. A vote is being undertaken between these proposals and the status quo. Please vote and/or contribute your comments. Thanks. Kevintoronto 21:34, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

British Columbia general election, 2005
Jack, please accept my apologies for delisting candidates you had listed as nominated. That was not my intention. It is the normal practice to not link non-notable, non-elected candidates. I had reverted your edits as I thought that is all you had done, I see now that you had re-liked non-notable candidates as well as updated the table for recent nominations. I will delink the candidates again while maintaining your updates. Thanks for all of your help on the page which I actually created some months ago :) - Jord 20:36, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

British political parties Template
Hi Jack, I think this still needs a bit of work. I've added some thoughts to its discussion page. --Cavrdg 08:44, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

George Smitherman
Please stop adding claims that Smitherman is "Deputy Premier". He does not have the title (see ). No Deputy Premier was appointed by McGuinty. AndyL 07:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

"Smitherman has taken questions when McGuinty is Away"

That would make him acting premier in that instance, not deputy premier. In the past in Ontario Deputy Premier was a formal portfolio with MPPs being officially sworn in as such. This is not the case with Smitherman. No Deputy Premier has been sworn in in Ontario under McGuinty and you will find no official reference to anyone in the McGuinty government having such a title. See the official list of cabinet ministers, no Deputy Premier. Please don't invent one. AndyL 07:14, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Primary candidates VFD
Many of the candidates for the June 14, 2005, congressional primary have been proposed for deletion. I am writing those who worked on election articles to request that they offer their votes against the proposal. The VFD's can be found starting at Votes_for_deletion/Log/2005_August_8. It is my view that we ought to provide a complete record of the election and my deleting so called "minor" candidates we do a disservice to them and the historical record. Please vote against all these proposals.PedanticallySpeaking 14:54, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

speedy deletion tag
This seems to have been an error, the editor who put the tag on your page indicated as much when i sent a msg to him. DES (talk) 18:23, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

speedy
Yup, it was my mistake. I opened up your page for error and didn't realize it was your personal one. Sorry :) --Raistlin 18:34, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Laura Bush
If you are unsure if she was a drunk driver, why did you put the drunk driver category on her article? Zoe 05:33, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Template:NFL
Thank you for your interest in redesigning Template:NFL. However, this is a main component of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. I reverted your edit to the 20:58, 3 August 2005 version because that format was previously discussed and argeed to on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League. If you would like to change it to your version, please discuss it on that talk page. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:30, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Justice Sunday
Thanks for correcting my date! "Doh!" Alan Canon 14:15, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Schmidt and Hackett
You worked on articles on the special election in Ohio on August 2. I have posted my articles on the nominees in that race, Jean Schmidt and Paul Hackett, at Peer review and would appreciate your comments. The individual pages are at Peer review/Jean Schmidt/archive1 and Peer review/Paul Hackett/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 19:27, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

Social Conservatisim
Social conservatisim is not the forced adherence to religon, Liberalisim is the dissulution of religon. Just to remind you, all civil law is based upon the ten commandments.


 * Are you talking about the same ten commandments I know? Out of the ten, only two are laws:

don't kill don't steal

One is half is a law, if you lie under oath. It is interesting, your proposition that civil law was non-existent before the ten commandments, considering the well documented Code of Hammurabi existing previously, as well as other human societies in general, which indubitably had organizing principles that would qualify as "laws" to us. A statement so blind to history can only be construed by a discerning individual as some sillygoose spouting theistic talking points. Read up on your history. Also, your definition of liberalism leaves a little something to be desired. --B. Phillips 21:35, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Seinfeld reference
Jack, the sentence in the dry heave section about "filming over something" could use some context -- it's a non sequitur. Paul Klenk 03:24, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Template:NFL Stadiums
Thank you for your contribution to this template. However I have reverted it for now per my reasoning at Template talk:NFL Stadiums. If you would like to discuss it there please feel free.Gateman1997 00:42, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Julie Cooper
Note: Stop changing the name to (formerly Julie Cooper Nichol), you are incorrect as she was widowed not divorced either way keeping her married name of(Cooper Nichol) she has not yet remarried Jimmy (although it appears she will) until that point she is Julie Cooper Nichol. If she remarries Jimmy she will become Julie Cooper (formerly Julie Cooper Nichol) Mac Domhnaill 03:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject U.S. Congress
Jack- --Markles 01:24, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * You've done such a great job with the U.S. Senate lists. Why don't you add your name to the WikiProject's participants (WikiProject U.S. Congress)?
 * Why don't you add each of your new templates to Project's list of templates WikiProject U.S. Congress?
 * What do you think about adding the years of the Senate (e.g. United States Senators in the 108th Congress (2005-2007))?
 * Check out the "notice" I've recently added to the Talk pages of the currently existing Senate articles (93-110). See, e.g., Template talk:105th Senate.

You might also yake a loook at Categories for deletion. It currently has an unresolved question about Category names for U.S. Congress members. I'd welcome your thoughts or input there. Thanks, Lou I 20:38, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:KellyRowan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KellyRowan.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use  .)  If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. Thue | talk 17:31, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Not that I doubt you but...
How do you know David Safavian is Arab?

signed CD

PETA
How, pray tell, is PETA screwing up America? They are a fringe organization that is quite happy to be just that and harms barely anything.

Succession Box
Hi Jack,

I was just thinking I should add a California 6th Congressional district succession box to Barbara Boxer' article, but I'm still a novice here and perhaps I was going to meet with difficulties. Thanks pal!

Blue Star 12:08, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

CREW 13 most corrupt
I don't think that membership in CREW's list of the 13 most corrupt members of the Congress merits inclusion in the articles about the figures who made the list. The list is one group's view of corruption at a point in time, and is not significantly more important than other accusations of corruption by other groups. I'm interested in hearing what you think. NatusRoma 04:17, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

John G. Roberts
I have reverted all your edits on the sitting justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Roberts has not yet been confirmed; once he is confirmed, he still will not be Chief Justice until he is sworn in. Sorry. Brandon39 05:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Drunk driving category
Hey, I've reverted two of your drunk driving category adds (here and here) because they had no evidence in the article or in your edit summary, and some brief Internet searching didn't corroborate them (and in Pippen's case, refuted it). Let me know if you disagree with these. SpuriousQ 23:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar
I came over to give you a Barnstar, but I see you just got one. It's well-deserved. Keep up the good work. Cheers, -Willmcw 05:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Josh Radnor
How did you know that Josh Radnor was Jewish? What source did you find that information from? Va girl2468 01:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Peer review for The West Wing
I have started a peer review of The West Wing at Peer review/The West Wing (television) and I inviite you to take part in the discussion and help make the necessary changes as the community as a whole reviews the work that we have all done together on this article. Thank you very much for your work on the article! -Scm83x 06:59, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:


 * [[Image:Edit_Summary-2.png|Edit summary text box]]

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Viriditas | Talk 07:50, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

A Message to Pro-Life Wikipedians
The section "Foetal Pain" (Fetal Pain) has been deleted from the Abortion article. Could you help restore it? If you would like to see what was deleted, go to my talk page, scroll to "Fetal Pain," and click the provided link.--Thomas Aquinas 22:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Wrong category
I reached your webpage via the Pro-Life user page, but after viewing your babel I'm afraid that someone may have added it against you wishes...Just letting you know. Chooserr

FAC for The West Wing (television)
I have put The West Wing article up as a candidate for featured article status. Your input and support in the FAC located here would be appreciated! Thanks! -Scm83x 08:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

CFD
Hi - Just thought I'd let you know Category:Minnesota Vikings sex scandal has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is at Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_December_5. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:34, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Fractional Rowspan
In what skin does your fractional rowspan work? E.g. your recent U.S. Congressional Delegations from California editing, in which you changed rowspan from 2 to 1.5. Or is there something else that it does? Cheers!! --Mark Adler (Markles)  19:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Edward Schreyer
Well, the story seems legit -- I apologize for jumping the gun. CJCurrie 01:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Pro-life celebrities category up for deletion!
Hi, I see that you are listed as a Pro-Life Wikipedian, well the Pro-life celebrities category is up for deletion. Category:Pro-life celebrities The abortion zealots don't want anyone to think that any celebrity is actually pro-life. Dwain 23:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Deletion of 'liberals wikipedians' category
Hi. I saw you're (like me) listed in this category which is up for deletion. Hoped you'd like to vote in favor of keeping it... Thanks! Larix 23:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Anglican userbox
Hi, it may interest you to know there is now an Anglican userbox. It's  . --Angr (t·c) 10:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Karla Homolka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Karla Homolka.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adnghiem501 03:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Template:Digimon
I stumbled upon this and I think that while it is relatively pertinent, the template as is is a hueas piece of clumped links of which only a few are relevant to any articleit might be added to. So I'm considering breaking it into 4 or 5 distinct templates: a dedicated one for eachseason and one overall eith only links to, say, the games, seasons and Lingo, what do you think? I will be notifying other participants of Wikiproject digimon so that discussion can be held at the wikiproject's talk page Circeus 04:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I have startd to work on this at User:Circeus/Digimon. Circeus 21:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:108th Senate.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:108th Senate.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rossrs 16:53, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, just tagging this as "fair use" is not good enough. You still have to say who made the image (you? or somebody else?). Also the fairuse tag is deprecated - use is only fair with respect to particular articles, so generic "fair use" is impossible, and at some point the template, category, and everything still in it will all go away. Stan 22:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Libd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Libd.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion &#9733; talk 22:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:VinickSullivan.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:VinickSullivan.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrboltz (T | C) 02:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Digimon Systems Update, again
I'm trying to get some stuff done over at the digimon wikiproject, and have reorganized the project page. I also added a To-do list. In hoping we can collaborate. Circeus 17:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Boston_Public_Cast.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Boston_Public_Cast.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sheryl_Crow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sheryl_Crow.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 07:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Gerrard Kennedy for federal Liberal leader
What is your source for this? I've not heard or seen it anywhere? - Jord 16:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:JBaldacci.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:JBaldacci.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Baldacci.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Baldacci.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 09:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

No honorifics please
According to the Wikipedia style manual we should not be using honorifics such as The Honourable at the beginning of entries. Please see the section of the style book on honorifics, thanks. Homey 23:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Categories
Hi, I noticed that you created many "member" categories for fraternities and sororities which is good but it would be very helpful in the future if you would add on to these categories instead of just placing 1-2 names because it becomes a likely candidate for CfD. Thanks -- † Ðy§ep§ion † 06:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Katie Holmes
Greetings! You have edited the Katie Holmes page in the past. I've completely reworked the article and have posted it on WP:PR in the hopes of advancing it to WP:FAC. I would be grateful for your comments at Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Neil_LeBlanc.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neil_LeBlanc.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 13:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:AngusKing.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AngusKing.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Tawker 00:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:ONB.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ONB.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:CSIMIAMI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CSIMIAMI.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 10:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Conrad Black
Hi,

I notice that a while ago you added Conrad Black to the category Knights Commander of the British Empire. I've done a search of the London Gazette looking for an announcement of such a knighthood being awarded to him but I can't find anything. I find it doubtful with his current legal problems that the Queen would bestow such an honour upon him. I am wondering where you came accross this information ? Please repond on my talk page. Thanks Dowew 19:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

OscarTop
Hello, I noticed that you created a new set of templates for Oscar recipients. Unfortunately, when these are implemented in an article, the text is overlapping with the infobox. I've tried to correct this by adjusting Template:OscarTop, but my feeble efforts haven't made things any better. Can you take a look? -- MisterHand 18:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind the Oscar temps, but I moved them to the bottom near each actor's filmography for style reasons. Crumbsucker 01:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:CHPlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CHPlogo.gif. It has been tagged as in fair use. Please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. Thank you, Shyam  ( T / C ) 19:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Conpsmall.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Conpsmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 17:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Consmall.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Consmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 17:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cuksmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cuksmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZsinjTalk 21:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cymru.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cymru.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 22:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dole.bob.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dole.bob.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 21:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Uup.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Uup.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 06:41, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dupsmall.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dupsmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 09:53, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Governor Templates
Good collection, but they don't belong in that Namespace. I think you may want to move them to your User page. See Articles for deletion/Governor Templates. &mdash;Markles 21:41, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I like that you're standardizing these templates. However, the names are now too small to read. Maybe you could use SuccessorSeries for all of them? &mdash;Markles 22:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

The names were too small. Look at the hundreds of other navigational templates here. You'll see that they don't use font-size:90% and. I'm just trying to keep the legibility of these templates relatively consistent. Look at Franklin Roosevelt, which uses NYGovernors— the templates ought to have some consistency, right? &mdash;Markles 05:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey, why the Revert war? Haven't you considered what I've written in my edit summaries and messages to you? Look at Franklin Roosevelt, for instance. Please. &mdash;Markles 18:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Paul Clement.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Paul Clement.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JesseW, the juggling janitor 02:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

And Image:Paul Douglas.jpg, too. JesseW, the juggling janitor 02:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Conpsmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Conpsmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - SCEhard T 05:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jnicklaus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jnicklaus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Judy.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Judy.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner  // Tawkerbot2 19:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MeDavid.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MeDavid.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 21:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Roy_Romer.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Roy_Romer.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

American Politics
Yikes, you might want to archive some of this. Anyway, to the point. If you are liberal and interested in American politics and know political history, if you ever run across Hofstadter's American Politcal Tradition and the Men Who Made It in a used book store pick it up, it's an interesting excersize in rhetoric. TKE 08:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

State treasurers template problem
Template:U.S. State Treasurers might be better having a more ambiguous name. William Donald Schaefer, who is listed on this template for Maryland, is not the Treasurer of Maryland, but is the Comptroller of Maryland. Both are two separate offices, but the Comptroller is the chief financial officer of the state. I assume your intention was to create a template for the chief financial officers. -- tomf688 {talk} 03:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

CSI categories
These categories have been nominated for renaming Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_6 (most votes so far have been to delete though). Arniep 15:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Boston Legal Cast.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Boston Legal Cast.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 14:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

June Meetup in New York
Hi, from a fellow Canadian (and graduate of McGill Faculty of Law, if you ever need any pointers about getting into a Canadian law school, let me know). I noticed you are characterized as a New Yorker so perhaps you might be in the NYC area in June. If you are interested we are having a meetup for Wikipedians in June in NYC. Take a peek at this and please tell any other Wikipedians that you think might be interested in participating about this event. Thanks. Alex756 02:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:Actors and actresses appearing on CSI
I'm not sure if you were aware, but a category you created, Category:Actors and actresses appearing on CSI, was nominated for renaming. The debate ended with a consensus to delete the category. I raised the matter on Deletion review as the category was never tagged for deletion. I just thought I'd let you know as you are the creator of that category. Tim! 13:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Cat Lovers' Committee
, I can see from your userboxes that you love cats.

Would you be interested in joining the Wikipedia Cat Lovers' Committee?

If you want to join, you can add yourself to the members list and contact me, Sergeant Snopake, on my talk page or the committee founder, GeorgeMoney, on his.

The Wikipedia Cat Lover's Committee has also been nominated for deletion.

Please comment on the deletion page to help keep the committee going.

Please vote keep.

Thank You very much!:)

Sergeant Snopake, 11:06, 21th of April 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Just a quick question. As i was browsing your babel boxes (looking for some to borrow) and i noticed that you have one that says you like cigars and another that says you detest tobacco smoke. Now, this got me confused. Because seeing as you also had a box that says you dislike second hand smoke, and guessing or gaussing rather, that you probably smoke cigars not to inhail them, then presumibly smoke would be present. I am flustered as to the contradictoriness of the two, or presumibly three boxes. I would appriciate a response when time permits and that all or a few of the boxes that contradict each other be removed. Thank you. --Gephart 06:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, i didnt mean to upset or piss you off, i was just curious. I apologize if i offended you, seeing as that was not my intention.  Also, i noticed your talk page is getting really full, if you want help putting some or all into an archive page i would be more than will to help you.  Thanks. --Gephart 17:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

MAGovernors and NYGovernors
What's the problem with my well-explained edits that you have to revert them without the courtesy of a civil explanation? I've considered everything you've said about smaller-sized fonts. I've asked other people for their opinions. And then I gave in to you and I made the font smaller. (See my latest edit to Template:MAGovernors.)

I even said, "OK, User:Jack Cox, you win. I've used a smaller font-size but kept the standardized template." (See id.)

Why did you AGAIN revert me without comment or explanation? &mdash;Markles 23:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

The whole Massachusetts New York Thing
THERE IS NO INDIVIDUAL style for each different box there is one universal style for all that's why I've reverted. I'm getting to the point where you have driven me to madness and i want to say you to please kindly mind your own ****ing business.--Jack Cox 02:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Your inappropriate rudeness and foul language notwithstandng, I appreciate your getting back to me.
 * As you request, I am applying a universal style.
 * As you have previously requested, I reduced the font size.
 * I complied with your requests. That was insufficient for you.  You wouldn't take "yes" for an answer.  It has left me with the only option that you want to apply your own standards without regard for the edits of fellow Wikipedia editors, or the reading needs of Wikipedia readers.
 * As for minding my own business, what does that mean?
 * If you want to have a revert war, the least you could do is explain the reasons for your revert and consider the opinions expressed by other editors. &mdash;Markles 12:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Circumcision Userbox
You may find a userfied version of the deleted box in my user space at User:Tomyumgoong/ubx/nocirc, feel free to subst or transclude it if you wish. Tomyumgoong 07:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

If you don't like one edit, why do you revert everything? There were many changes from one version to the other.&mdash;Markles 05:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Marijuana Wiki
Hi there,

A fellow Canadian with Asperger's eh?

I see that you are a pro-Cannabis Wikipedian so I hope this will be of some interest to you.

I've started a Marijuana wiki (aka The Sticky Wiki) which I think you might be interested in. I'm hoping you can help me get started with this project. Whereas lots of articles about weed get speedy-deleted on Wikipedia, they would be totally cool over at MarijuanaWiki. But really I want the site to be more of a marijuana community than merely an encyclopedia.

To give you an example, I want to have city guides about where to score, find pot-friendly cafes, marijuana events, and what represents a good price in that city. Etc. (You can check out the featured article: "Toronto" to see what I mean). I also want to have grow diaries and marijuana blogs. All in all, basically more communal than encyclopedic.

I am in need of admins/moderators, and people experienced with MediaWiki to help build policy, categories, and templates, etc. If you'd be interested in helping me with this project, the URL is MarijuanaWiki

Thanks for your time and consideration. Hope to see you there!

-- nsandwich 23:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

List of Desperate Housewives characters
Why did you add bad information about Andrew and Bree Van De Kamp to the list of Desperate Housewives characters? I removed the misinformation, but there surely is a reason for the addition in the first place. OrangutanCurse 02:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

New York State County Routes
Hello! I noticed you were from New York State, and was wondering if you would work on a wikiproject, on the county routes in New York State. If you are interested, please say so on my talk page. Thank you.Smartyshoe 19:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Zelos Wilder.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zelos Wilder.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:06, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians
Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Categories for deletion. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Marissa Cooper
Hey, a couple of things. The audience isn't 100% certain if she is dead or not, this will probably be confrimed or changed (i.e. she may be in a coma) when the 4th season comes along. So unless there is an offical source saying she is dead please leave it as unknown. Also please leave plot endings in the spoiler alert section, we don't want to ruin the story for someone just browsing pages. Thanks --DragonWR12LB 03:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Stuff
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Ardenn 19:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Mugen Goes Crazy.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Mugen Goes Crazy.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion
Hello! I noticed that you have identified yourself as an Anglican, and so I thought that you may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Zatch Bell! - voice of Penny

 * I was going to put Stephanie Sheh as the voice of Penny too, seeing as the first Google hit was the normally reliable AnimeNewsNetwork. But then I noticed several more hits for an unknown voice actress named Jennifer Sekiguchi, one link stating that she was at a VA con.  Please, check the link out for yourself.  Danny Lilithborne 12:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh crap, it's one of *those* deals. Alright, sorry for the confusion. :) Danny Lilithborne 12:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)