User talk:Jack McCauley

May 2017
Your recent edits to User talk:Nomoskedasticity could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. &mdash; JJ Be  rs  19:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. &mdash; JJ Be  rs  19:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. &mdash; JJ Be  rs  19:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your block, and where to go from here
As shown above I've blocked you for the legal threats, and the threat to expose a user's personal information at Jack McCauley. I also understand your concerns, and that you would want to be sure what was written on the article is accurate. Please, read over WP:BLPSELF and specifically, this here from that article: "If you are an article subject and you find the article about you contains your personal information or potentially libelous statements contact the oversight team so that they can evaluate the issue and possibly remove it from the page history."

I would suggest that you please reach out to our oversight team on this matter. They can work with you to validate your identity, and ensure that the information in the article is kept as accurate as possible. This portion is for your benefit, as we want to verify who someone claims to be, is actually that person. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Hold on
Someone deleted your message from my talk page before I got a chance to read it, but I was able to see it in the history of my talk page. If you review the history of the Jack McCauley article, you'll see that I HAVE NOT added any sensitrive material. All I've done is delete sensitive material, including all of the edits done by Minton Bruce.

I'm not thrilled about being threatened with legal action when what I've been doing is deleting, not adding, sensitive or inappropriate materiel. You've boasted of your technical prowess. If you're really the subject of the article, that's well warranted. And it shouldn't be difficult for you to look through the history of the article over the last month and see that you have no grievance with me. Even if you're not really the subject of the article, it ain't all that herd to figure out how to read the history of a wiki page. Please do so and then please leave me alone, even if you get your block lifted. Thanks. David in DC (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2017 (UTC)