User talk:Jack Schlederer

Welcome!

Help
helpme Can you give me some examples where an only warning for vandalism would be issued? Jack Schlederer Talk   Adds  02:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Generally I'd say attacking other users/people, the very offensive stuff, racial slurs and the like, usually warrants an only warning. -- Jac 16888 Talk 03:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * (Adding a bit)
 * Something pretty horrifically bad, but not quite instant-blockable.
 * For vandalism specifically, an account used exclusively for disruptive purposes could be blocked without warning, but in a borderline case, it may be worthwhile trying a 1-time warning (and then watching to see what happens). It also depends on the history. You asked for examples, so...
 * A school IP address, which had been blocked many times in the past; the last time was a couple of months ago, and I notice that, today, it's vandalized several articles but not yet had any 'new' warnings. In that case, I might try a 1-time warning. Others might block it; it's a judgment-call. Immediate blocking and adding the template makes it more reasonable to simply block; after all, they can just sign up for an account.
 * A user with about 100 edits, mostly good, with some history of warnings for uncivil comments, suddenly vandalizing an article with 'extreme obscenities'. It would be quickly reverted, so no great harm; if they were blocked, we might lose a (mostly) valuable contributor. They might listen to the big only warning thing.
 * I should also emphasize, here, the Please do not bite the newcomers guidelines too.
 * Hope this is useful; all IMHO, of course.  Chzz  ►  03:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Guestbook!
-- iBen (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Jack Schlederer
Hi Jack Schlederer. I noticed you created an RfA page some time ago. I was wondering as to what the status of that RfA might be. Please let me know if you still intend to run for adminship with that RfA; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete it for you in about a week or so from today. Regards,  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

why go?
why? :( I don't know you but it kind of makes me sad. Tommy!  [ message ] 20:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:USS Clarence L. Evans.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:USS Clarence L. Evans.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)