User talk:Jack Styler

Wikileaks
Please read the article before editing. The material you are adding has already been covered in the article, and doesn't need repeating. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at WikiLeaks. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Rhododendrites (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Rhododendrites (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Jack, your edits to WikiLeaks make no sense. In the first place, the material you're adding is redundant as it's already in the article later down. Second, you put it "nowhere". You inserted it below the table of contents but not in any legitimate section of the article. Beyond that, you can see that other editors are undoing your edits; yet, you persist and keep adding it back. I'm willing to make allowances because you're new, but if you need help in understanding how to edit at Wikipedia, you're going to need to talk to me. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)