User talk:Jack deGrasse Tyson

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. INC isn't a major party hence avoid it's addition on the infobox and do not remove JSP as it was already discussed 456legend  talk  03:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * After Jahan's sister joined INC many YSRCP leaders joining INC. Then why not it's now a major party. Jack deGrasse Tyson (talk) 04:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Leaders merely joining the party do not indicate it to be a major party. The electoral data including the previous election turnout and result must indicate such claims. To establish INC to be a major party in this election, it is also necessary for you to provide reliable and relevant sources to support the same. You can add them in the campaign section and accordingly the notability can be established. 456legend  talk  01:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Srimonbanik2007. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Izno (talk) 21:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Note that I'm not sure that you've done multiple reverts, but I am having trouble removing unreferenced material from the article. Mikeblas (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.