User talk:Jackarias

File copyright problem with File:TWGSB Wikiepdia Logos.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TWGSB Wikiepdia Logos.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  17:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:TWGSB Wikiepdia Logos.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:TWGSB Wikiepdia Logos.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  17:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:TWGSB Wikipedia Logos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TWGSB Wikipedia Logos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Tunbridge Wells Grammar School for Boys - Coordinates
Hi, the coordinates need to be in decimals - have you got them in that form, please? TerriersFan (talk) 21:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Headteacher
Hello. I understand why you keep reverting the term "headmaster" to "headteacher", based on this article, and you are perfectly correct, but when you make a change like this, could you please leave an edit summary, with possibly a link to justify your edit? Thank you. Radiopathy (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TWGSB Wikipedia Logos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TWGSB Wikipedia Logos.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2010
Your addition to St Margaret's Church, Halstead has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Paste Let’s have a chat. 17:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:St-Katharine-Kent.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:St-Katharine-Kent.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Kent churches
Hi Jackarias – thanks for your message at my talk page. I will have time after the weekend to start helping you expand the two church articles you mentioned. I have only a passing familiarity with that part of Kent, but that's unlikely to matter too much as long as I can find appropriate sources. In the meantime, I suggest having a look for Nikolaus Pevsner's book Kent: West & the Weald in the Buildings of England series (ISBN 978-0-300-09614-9). He always devotes much space to architectural and contextual descriptions of Anglican churches. Also check for local church-related guidebooks: there are bound to be books similar to those I use for Sussex churches, with titles like "Looking Towards West Sussex Country Churches", "Mid Sussex Church Walks", "101 Medieval Churches of West Sussex"... Just some suggestions there to start with; after Sunday I'll try to spend some proper time on these two articles (and others?). Cheers, Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  21:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:St-Margaret-Kent.jpg


The file File:St-Margaret-Kent.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)