User talk:Jackassman00

Welcome!

Hello, Jackassman00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sane Smith, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Sane Smith


A tag has been placed on Sane Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sane Smith, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BAMA (artist)


The article BAMA (artist) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. AllyD (talk) 09:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Rhinoceros
Hi. I've edited your recent article, D. s. harrissoni, while your other rhino article still requires cleanup. Please note that rhino is spelt rhinoceros, without a "u". Additionally, articles require reliable sources and sufficient notability; see for example the journal citation I added. Thanks. ~ AH1 (discuss!) 18:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Bruree


A tag has been placed on Battle of Bruree requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hallows  AG  08:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Bruree


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Battle of Bruree, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sparthorse (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Reliable sources for The Rascals (Atwater Village)
Your contributions to the The Rascals (Atwater Village) article are appreciated, but most of the article's references are unreliable sources such as blogs and forums. The L.A. Times reference would be helpful if it specified which page (web or paper) the information comes from. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Rascals (Atwater Village)


The article The Rascals (Atwater Village) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable per WP:CLUB, no mention of them online, no mention of them in sources given, possible WP:HOAX.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Indo-Chinese Elephant


The article Indo-Chinese Elephant has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, no mention of this species online, possible WP:HOAX.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Holmes County


The article Battle of Holmes County has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced; no mention of it online, possible WP:HOAX

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siege of Limerick (968)


The article Siege of Limerick (968) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced; no mention of it online, possible WP:HOAX

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Selkent


The article Battle of Selkent has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced; no mention of it online, possible WP:HOAX

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Limerick Shore


The article Battle of Limerick Shore has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced; no mention of it online, possible WP:HOAX

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Nekhen


The article Battle of Nekhen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced; no mention of it online, possible WP:HOAX

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instawisdom (talk) 09:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Mathgamain mac Cennétig appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Instawisdom (talk) 09:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Selkent for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Selkent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Battle of Selkent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Instawisdom (talk) 05:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly creating hoax articles. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 06:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your painfully obvious sock puppet account has also been blocked. Nick-D (talk) 07:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)