User talk:Jackattaaaack

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jackattaaaack. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place help me on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! —Aranya (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Album article formatting
Please see WP:MOSALBUM for future album article formatting. Album titles are to be italicized in every instance, as well as some publications, like Entertainment Weekly. Thanks. --Jennica ✿ / talk 04:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Formatting #2
Again. please italicize publications, such a New York Times, which you didn't do on your edit for Lust for Life. You also didn't add a reference.

and please use American English when editing on American people's pages. --Jennica ✿ / talk 03:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norman Fucking Rockwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slant ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Norman_Fucking_Rockwell check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Norman_Fucking_Rockwell?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Stop Disruptive Editing
Please, stop your disruptive and unexplained content removal in different music-related articles as you've been seen doing regularly. Looking at your entire edit history you seem to be promoting a certain systemic bias. The sources used for the review on the Justice album was chosen by thorough discussion, Don't change it. Don't leave the edit summary blank, explain what changes you've made to the article. And stop trying to mislead others by checking the "This is a minor edit" box when you've made substantial and controversial unexplained edits to the article. --- A Wiki Genius  ❤  16:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your message - I appreciate your comment. Firstly: I was not aware of the "thorough discussion" that had taken place for choosing the critics/publications to include in the critical reception chart, so I apologize if that is the case. Secondly: I understand that I should be explaining any edits made - this was not intentional, but an accident on my part, and I will make sure to do that from now on and I apologize for not doing so.

HOWEVER: it was not my intent for my edits to be "disruptive", nor to represent a "systemic bias". To call the edits I made "controversial" is a gross misstatement.

I replaced the Irish Times score with the Consequence of Sound score for three reasons: - Firstly; the Irish Times has never been used in any of the critical reception charts of Justin Bieber's previous discography pages. - Secondly: The Irish Times review is not listed on Metacritic's own website, whereas the COS review is listed on both the Metacritic AND AnyDecentMusic? websites. - Thirdly; the COS grade of 'C' better reflects the albums' scores on both Metacritic (62/100) and AnyDecentMusic? (5.9/10). To expand on this: the critical reception chart (including the Irish Times grade of 4/5 stars) represents an average score of 66/100 or 3.3/5, whereas if you replaced the Irish Times score with the COS score (i.e. the edit I made), it results in an average of 62/100 - the albums' MetaScore and is thus better-representative of the larger critical response to this album.

Finally: I was not trying to "mislead others" by making these changes, as you accuse. None of the (very few) edits I made on the Justice album were factually incorrect: the reviews are the reviews; the respective ratings are the ratings; I made sure to link the correct COS article to its grading in the chart - nothing was fabricated or reported incorrectly.

Obviously I respect and appreciate your time for writing your feedback on my inaccuracies surrounding the edit summary. However in response, it's also important for me to take the time to explain the rationale behind the edit and point some of the inaccuracies in your accusations. Thanks. Jackattaaaack (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)