User talk:Jackgriffo5

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Ilott


A tag has been placed on Anthony Ilott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iniciativass (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Gaminara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Gaminara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Gaminara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  15:47, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthony Ilott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Ilott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anthony Ilott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  15:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Non-notable actors
Please stop creating new articles on non-notable actors. Please read the guidelines on notability for actors. If the guidelines are not met the articles will be deleted.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  15:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Anthony Ilott, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Iniciativass (talk) 05:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Jackgriffo5, you are invited to the Teahouse!
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Aron&April654321. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)