User talk:Jackie cox

Jackie cox (talk) 05:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Etghnic cleansing anglos from quebec
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Etghnic cleansing anglos from quebec, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Etghnic cleansing anglos from quebec. eaolson (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Quebec

 * Your article Etghnic cleansing anglos from quebec [sic] was speedy deleted under criteria A7, "An article about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." I'm pretty sure I just tagged your article for proposed deletion, which is a different animal and I don't think criteria A7 is valid in this case. You could take this up at Deletion review to get your article undeleted, but I think it would be a waste of time. Your article read like an original essay, which violates Wikipedia's rule against original research. It was written from the first person, not in an encyclopedic style. Lastly, you listed no reliable sources to support the claims in your article, which is one of the few rules of Wikipedia. No one is "refusing to publish the truth," but there are a few minimum standards for WP articles. eaolson (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ---the montreal gazette has a forum page about ethnic cleansing anglos from quebec, there are so many entries into this thread that you could take days to read, it deserves to be listed on your ethnic cleansing page---i  can see that you may not have the time or interest or whatever, to check out this fact, and its your responsibility to put truth in wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackie cox (talk • contribs)
 * Again, you don't understand. There is no "your page" or "your responsibility" at Wikipedia. If you want to add a fact to an existing page, or create a new page, that's fine. You just have to be able to support it with reliable sources. eaolson (talk) 03:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

to verify my comments about ethnic cleansins anglos from quebec, use the google search engine to search " Ethnic Cleansing Anglos from Quebec, in the search you will find the lastest figures and the subject while continually taken down, deleted by the quebec separatists keeps popping up by those ethnically cleansed from quebec. I am on the side of wikipedia, and truth posting, however I see many domains have deleted wikepida as a reliable source, because of editors possibly dedicating posts to financial contributors, or are trying to be the gatekeepers of one particular brand of data, which is becoming apparant by the same unqualified person deleting the posts I contribute, which are fact and if investigated would remain in wikipedia, and replae the biased posts I try to replace with truthful ones. Since the same person deletes my post continually, and the post I try to show real facts are without any valid citation, I propose edelson SP? be deleted as an editor. my phone number 361 461 4684. I am dedicated to the internet, and think wikipedia is at the leading edge of free and meaningfu information freely given to all who search, yet I see there are editors in your midst who are in fact sabotuers of wikipedia. a leading edge of the one book, a place where the worlds children can freely meet and join together without subversion in search for real truth, and feel it important that people involved in wikipedia, unqualified, or qualified but with questionable influences are diluting your website, and when discovered removed from the realm of authority. Brass beds are an important part of history, responsible for eliminating a very devestating infestation as severe as lymes disease, and was so widespread that its elimination was a principle contributor in the quality of life for humanity. As a vertically integrated industrial artist, one of my last projects was bell labs and the development of the silicon integrated circuits used by IBM to design the PC, after that I did extensive research on product development before beganing brass bed production, and the research was extensive. My imput is not friviious, your editor is either confused or biased, whatever he is irresponsible, and unable to do research and makes erroneous decisions regarding valid data, when compared to heresay info, without valid premise and tere has been erroneous spelling changes, by someone with the codes to alter the data.

Speedy deletion of Etghnic cleansing anglos from quebec
A tag has been placed on Etghnic cleansing anglos from quebec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~Matticus UC 09:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Toenail fungus cure
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Toenail fungus cure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Toenail fungus cure. ~Matticus UC 10:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Toenail fungus cure
A tag has been placed on Toenail fungus cure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Toenail fungus cure and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Brass bed
Hi. I've removed the comment you made at User:Ravickanth because that user has only made one edit to Wikipedia and it's not to the brass bed article that your comment was about. A few points: please don't leave comments on people's user pages, use their discussion page instead; please sign your comments by placing four tildes after them ( ~ ); and please don't add information to Wikipedia without providing a reference for it. Thanks. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Bed frame. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Neil N   talk to me  21:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)