User talk:Jackieeg

Welcome!
Hello, Jackieeg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Tequesta did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Donald Albury 01:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacqueline Elaine Gomez


A tag has been placed on Jacqueline Elaine Gomez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Valdemar2018 (talk) 03:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Warning on WP:BLP
Please review our policies on biographies of living persons prior to again editing any biographical articles or material. This especially regards the sections regarding potentially controversial content and appropriate sourcing for them. "Sourcing" serious allegations to blogs and Twitter is absolutely unacceptable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

I sourced interviews published online, I sourced news articles and I sourced first hand accounts of persons who have worked with her... discounting a twitter link as unacceptable at face value ignores the legitimacy of the source.
 * Firsthand accounts are not appropriate sources for something like that. We would be looking for things published in reliable and independent sources, and stick strictly to only what those high-quality references have stated. Not advocacy sites, not blogs, not tweets. Following BLP is not optional. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)