User talk:Jackieubar


 * }

July 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rhacel Parrenas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Rhacel Parrenas. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rhacel Parrenas. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — MC10 ( T • C • GB •L)  02:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Rhacel Parrenas. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 02:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Jackieubar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Jeff G. ツ 02:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)