User talk:Jackiewickens/Sandbox

Just had a read through of this, and you write really well! I can see it's going to be a great article. Hopefully, the information I've given you will help with the template. Worm   TT   10:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

1. Was the FEIS actually recommending no action as a preferred alternative? Otherwise indicate so.

2. When referring to and EIS, call it an EIS, not a study. EIS relies on "studies" for findings, they are not substitutable, and will confuse people if you refer to EIS as a study.

2. "alternative routes outside the national." National is an adjective requiring some noun to accompany it.

3. "The study therefore suggested the road not be completed because it would damage sacred areas beyond repair and disturb religious practices. The USFS rejected this recommendation, and also rejected suggested alternative routes outside the national." It seems like you intended a negative construction here, but this is actually very confusing as to what proposal within the EIS the USFS adopted. I'm not sure if they rejected the recommendation, or the plan to build such a road.

4. I'm interested if there is any more background or further consequences that could be added here.

Chris.arneson (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)