User talk:Jackillsfrm

Edits By Jackilsfrm to Blueprints - Star Trek
There is no conflict of interest here….The author states “Several individuals have developed blue prints”.. He just happens to be one. He is not promoting himself…just listing some blueprints he has developed along with many other individuals. Jackilsfrm if this gets into an edit war let me know.Shoessss 01:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello Jack. I added another note to Talk:List of Star Trek Blueprints.  I need something I can verify.  I need something I can lookup.  Thanks again for your contributions.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 06:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Clarification
"I have deleted the page I just do not feel that there is anything that I can do to make him happy, There are only so many hoops that I want to jump through. I will post this information somewhere else on the web, thanks for your time."
 * Point of note: I did not nominate the article for deletion. Someone else did that.  Don't blame me.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Something somebody suggested
Hey, you might want to check out the Memory Alpha wiki site. They might be interested in this material. They have their own set of inclusion policies, which you can read up here: MemoryAlpha:Memory Alpha:Canon policy. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

What about Memory Alpha?
Hi. You may want to look at Memory Alpha, a Star Trek Wiki, as a place for the article on blueprints. Cheers. --EarthPerson 18:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow - close set of edits! --EarthPerson 18:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

What about Memory Alpha?
I think that is what I am going to try thanks

List of Star Trek Blueprints
Hello Jackillsfrm just stopped by to see what’s going on with the article. Congratulations on your defense. It looks like you may have turned the tide on the deletion issues. No matter the outcome, I believe you did a “Great” job. Shoessss 22:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry to hear that. As I stated before, I believe it was a well written article that would most likely have a wide appeal to Star Trek fans.  I hope this does not discourage you from still contributing to Wikipedia in other areas.  In the mean time, I hope you saved the work you did.  In a few months let’s try again proposing the article to be included on the site.  Good luck to you and hope to see you around the web-site with more contributions Shoessss 18:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Star Trek Technical Manuals
An editor has nominated List of Star Trek Technical Manuals, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)