User talk:Jackinovaaantes


 * }

September 2013
Hello, Jackinovaaantes. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jack Soifer, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

neutral point of view help request
Thank you Ally D and Tomas e and all the others for your very helpful contributions in fact we are close connected to the subject and we really want to respect the Wikipedia rules like neutral point of view .Our page in Portuguese with the same content was removed so we really want a different end for this in English.Should we introduce a topic like criticism of Jack Soifer? Or remove the books list and just reference them in the wiki pages of the subject like sustainable tourism or entrepreneurship?

We've been receiving requests of independent people to collaborate in saving this page. All the contributors need to pass the stage of post 10 edits? That i can explain how because there are a lot of citation needed and as we Jackinovaaantes contribute to the others pages reinforcing is neutral point of view we will very pleased if others can post they opinion too on Jack Soifer.

Thank you a lot for helping beginners, at a smaller scale we start bringing new contributors to wikipedia too so we hope at the end all this troubles produce a better wikipedians network.

Jackinovaaantes (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there,

Firstly, they don't need 10 edits to edit the page; Anyone can with any number of edits. You only need 10 edits to get Autoconfirmed permission that allows you to upload files and edit semi-protected pages. A critisism section would be good,as it present a balanced point. In addition, the page should only have a few of his books on it - not an exhaustive list.

Feel free to get back in contact if you want more help, -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  16:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Jack Soifer
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Jack Soifer, may be copied from http://www.wikifolks.org/wiki/index.php/Jack_Soifer. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 21:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Soifer


A tag has been placed on Jack Soifer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 06:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)