User talk:Jackschmitz

Welcome!
Hello, Jackschmitz, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Practice has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Practice was changed by Jackschmitz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951584 on 2016-02-10T07:29:29+00:00.

Peer Review; Brionema
The article looks good, however, make sure you have enough information to create a proper lead section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brionema (talk • contribs) 04:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

I think that you improved the the overall summary of the lead section. I think adding more background information about the novel, such as inspirations or things along those lines may be helpful. I also think that the article needs to be lengthened quiet a bit. I think that this article is a little vague and needs more information in order for the reader to get a better understanding of the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collsh0311 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review; Brian
I like what you did, Jack, but I would add in background information to make sure that a viewer that has no prior knowledge of the novel can get a better glimpse of it. I like that you added length to the section, and everything you added seemed relevant and calculated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bri rei (talk • contribs) 18:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)