User talk:Jacksogh

Welcome!

Speedy deletion nomination of George jackson (orchestral conductor)


A tag has been placed on George jackson (orchestral conductor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Jacksogh (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Jacksogh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Nomination of George Jackson (conductor) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article George Jackson (conductor), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Jackson (conductor) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hairhorn (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Please do not recreate content deleted per community consensus. Thank you.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George jackson (orchestral conductor)


A tag has been placed on George jackson (orchestral conductor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PoinDexta1 |  Talk to Me  00:53, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Nakon 00:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Repost of George jackson (orchestral conductor)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hang on underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Autobiographies / conflict of interest
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 03:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:GeorgeJacksonConductor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GeorgeJacksonConductor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. multichill (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Conducting Savannah Spring.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conducting Savannah Spring.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:George jackson beethoven grave.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:George jackson beethoven grave.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Jackson (conductor) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Jackson (conductor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Repost of George Jackson (conductor)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George Jackson (conductor)


A tag has been placed on George Jackson (conductor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Karljoos (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George Jackson (conductor)


A tag has been placed on George Jackson (conductor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hairhorn (talk) 04:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George jackson (conductor)


A tag has been placed on George jackson (conductor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/George Jackson (conductor) (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. lovkal (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Recreating deleted article
Hello. You cannot recreate George Jackson (conductor) by just repeatedly creating the page since this violates CSD:G4, i.e the article has been deleted because of a deletion discussion where consensus was made. I recommend that you instead appeal the deletion through a deletion review.

Kind regards, lovkal (talk) 12:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

COI and notability guidelines
Hi - I was planning to come back to consider the speedy deletion request on your article this morning, but I see another administrator has beaten me to it. In light of your response to my question at its talk page, you really should review our conflict of interest guidelines. I had wondered whether you were actually the subject of the article (since there are obvious similarities between his name, and your username). You've indicated that you are not him, but that he is someone you know and have worked with, so you probably do have a conflict of interest, and should abide by the guidelines. This means that you need to declare your connection with him openly; it also means that you need to put any draft through the articles for creation process. This means that an experienced editor will review your draft prior to publication in mainspace.

You should probably also review our notability criteria, particularly GNG. What we need to support any article is multiple independent, secondary and reliable sources that give the subject significant depth of coverage. Independent means that they are independent of him, and of his work - not the websites of theatres he has played in, or of an orchestra he's associated with, but properly independent coverage, perhaps by a music critic. Secondary is discussed here - not interviews, but something where the author of the piece has checked facts and offers their own perspective. The way in which we assess reliability is discussed here. If you can put together a draft which has multiple sources of this nature, you may submit it for review via AfC, but you should not attempt to publish it yourself in main article space. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  07:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello chaps. Here is a new and severely reduced version of the page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:George_Jackson_(conductor)

Here are some links to convince some of you of the subject's notability:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opera/what-to-see/hansel-und-gretel-grange-park-opera-triumphs-tale-two-vastly/ https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/hansel-and-gretel-review-grange-park-opera-a4175101.html https://www.ft.com/content/d77a41fc-97fb-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36 https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/hansel-gretel-plays-at-grange-park-opera-a-very-pleasant-evening-at-grange-park-opera/ https://www.wssymphony.org/guest-artists/george-jackson-conductor/ https://www.schmopera.com/scene/people/george-jackson/ http://www.planethugill.com/2014/01/becoming-conductor-interview-with.html https://www.londonfirebird.com/2016/12/04/conductor-george-jackson-musician-month/ https://www.leedstownhall.co.uk/explore/details/interview-with-british-conductor-george-jackson https://www.yesweekly.com/winston-salem-symphony-presents-the-fourth-music-director-candidate-concerts-george-jackson-conducts-dvorak-five-conductors-one-baton-you-decide/ https://www.aspentimes.com/magazines/aspen-times-weekly/aspen-times-weekly-class-conduct/

I would appreciate if if you could re-instate this article you deleted, in its watered-down and reduced manner.

Cheers buddies!

Jacksogh (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George jackson (conductor)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, George jackson (conductor), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Jackson (conductor) (May 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Jackson (conductor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Jackson (conductor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:George_Jackson_(conductor) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:George_Jackson_(conductor) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Jackson (conductor) (May 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Jackson (conductor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Jackson (conductor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:George_Jackson_(conductor) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:78.26&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:George_Jackson_(conductor) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)