User talk:Jacksonriley0706

Welcome!

Hello, Jacksonriley0706, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of the Hundred Slain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of the Hundred Slain was changed by Jacksonriley0706 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911384 on 2012-01-30T23:23:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Thomas Starr King Middle School (Los Angeles)
Hi, I hate to bother you, but do you have any references to prove this school is notable? This article has many serious issues, and may be deleted as most middle schools are, at WP:AfD. Please fix the issues tagged in the article. If you need assistance, please contact me. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Long-tailed Hopping Mouse
Hey ! I saw your contribs on Long-tailed Hopping Mouse. Nice work. --RichardMills65 (talk) 03:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Thomas Starr King Middle School (Los Angeles) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Silver Lake and John Marshall High School


 * Atwater Village, Los Angeles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Marshall High School


 * Long-tailed Hopping Mouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Northern Territories

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Star Wars characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. When you recently edited Harris Farm Engagement, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richmond and Fredericksburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Narcisus Mage


The article Narcisus Mage has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not really WP:BLP, but there are no references for Mr. Mage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 06:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. When you recently edited Joseph Dawson (RMS Titanic), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edward Smith and Trimmer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Dawson (RMS Titanic) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Dawson (RMS Titanic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph Dawson (RMS Titanic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  role player 15:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Moiry Pass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of the most polluted rivers in the United States


The article List of the most polluted rivers in the United States has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:Original research; unreferenced; can't find sources online to support any of the figures cited.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scopecreep (talk) 17:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Timothy Joseph McGhee


The article Timothy Joseph McGhee has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ducknish (talk) 23:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timothy Joseph McGhee
Hi. You will notice in the page history, that I nominated this article for speedy deletion under Criteria G10, as an unsourced negative page about a living person. Please note, that I have withdrawn this nomination, fixed the page and repaired your sources, which were both broken. I have also withdrawn the warning which was placed here. I apologise for the error in tagging your material, and trust you will continue to contribute! MarkBurberry32 &#124; talk 00:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of the most polluted rivers in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Cedar River, Pigeon River, Blackwater River, Rock River and Martins Creek


 * Atwater Village, Los Angeles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Marshall High School

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Rainbow trout appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Epipelagic (talk) 05:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hohenloh + 21:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

With regard to Cutthroat Trout
Hi Jacksonriley0706 - I'm writing this to let you know about your recent edits to this article. You added an IUCN 3.1 vulnerability and species threat table to it, listing the entire species as classified vulnerable, and putting them therefore on the IUCN's Red list. It is true that there are some subspecies of the Cutthroat which are vulnerable, but they have not been classified as such by the IUCN, and having some subspecies vulnerable does not mean that the whole base species is the same. If you want to add stuff like this, please make sure that you verify it properly and give some due care and attention to the information you add. Thank you for contributing - MarkBurberry32 &#124; talk  23:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Boston Beaneaters (NL)
I have proposed that this article be merged into the Atlanta Braves article; see this discussion thread. Cheers. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mitchell Guist (Television)


The article Mitchell Guist (Television) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Nomination of List of the most polluted rivers in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the most polluted rivers in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of the most polluted rivers in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Frappyjohn (talk) 07:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 2012 Valparaíso earthquake for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 Valparaíso earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2012 Valparaíso earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 18:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vince's Market


The article Vince's Market has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. William Avery (talk) 09:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Vince's Market for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vince's Market is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vince's Market until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William Avery (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vince's Market


A tag has been placed on Vince's Market requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)