User talk:Jacksteinbrecher

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jacksteinbrecher
Please do not attempt to add biographical articles about people who, at least at present, are not notable.--Anthony.bradbury 23:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

6 October 2006

 * You've been warned before about adding irrelevant, unsourced information about non-notable people to Wikipedia. If the only purpose of this account is to include such information it may be blocked. Thanks.  Dei zio  talk 23:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Church of Sonic
A tag has been placed on Church of Sonic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Church of Sonic is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon, and also put a note on Talk:Church of Sonic saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions.Pascal.Tesson 21:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Bad taste
This is not acceptable conduct. Note also that I have opened a sockpuppetry case against this account, and. Pascal.Tesson 21:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Also note IP watch 141.158.53.73 which was sandwiched by this users edits on Peirce Middle School. TonyTheTiger 19:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Unblock me please
I am just adding my two cents here. Points in favor of request
 * 1) He self reverted his own foolery.
 * 2) He moved his foolery to sandbox after warning. (negated by resumption of foolery in my eyes)
 * 3) WP:AGF (assumed in warnings of 01:47, 13 September 2006, 23:23, 14 September 2006, 23:13, 6 October 2006, & 21:32, 14 November 2006) Seems to be a bad assumption.

Points against request
 * 1) Continuing foolery in following [months]
 * 2) Sockpuppetry especially sameday editing on October 13 from 71.230.137.30 on October 6 from 141.158.53.73 and November 14 from User:Sonic religion.
 * 3) September, October, November talk page warnings.

I don't know which way this will go. I am watching. It is curious situation for me, a CAT:RFU newbie. TonyTheTiger 20:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)