User talk:Jackstraw69

Redskins Reservation Interviews
The reference to the video was deleted because it did not link to the specific video being cited, but to the entire RedskinsFacts website. See: Citing_sources, which states that references to videos should be very specific, giving attribution details and the specific timestamp within the video containing the relevant information.FriendlyFred (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I found the video on YouTube and it is not a reliable source for Wikipedia content, but the opinions of a few individuals, otherwise known a primary source. I do not cite any of the anti-redskins videos for the same reason.FriendlyFred (talk) 01:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Then how is the video " Redskins is a Powerful Name ", considered a reliable source ?
 * The "Powerful Name" video was not cited directly, but referred to in news stories in the Washington Post and Time Magazine, which are secondary sources. I know of no such reporting on more recent videos.FriendlyFred (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

O.K. so if someone just wrote " a news story " about the Redskins Reservation Interviews video, then it could be cited ?
 * Basically yes, but it would have to be by a reliable news organization, not a blog or an obviously non-neutral source.FriendlyFred (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)