User talk:Jackyd101/Archive 9

Your GA nomination of Action of 6 November 1794
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 6 November 1794 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Battle of Mykonos
Hello! Your submission of Battle of Mykonos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK request
Hi, could you do me a tiny favor, and add the "approved" tick icon to your last comment at Template:Did you know nominations/La Nymphe surprise? People (and the bot) only go by the last icon which appears on a nomination, which is currently " ". Thanks a lot! M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  01:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Raid on Genoa
Harrias talk 09:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 6 November 1794
The article Action of 6 November 1794 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Action of 6 November 1794 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Henry Towry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pierre Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Mykonos
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 23:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

List of public art in the City of Westminster FLC review
Hi Jackyd101, do you feel that your comments have been addressed at the FLC review for List of public art in the City of Westminster? Ham II (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Action of 24 June 1795
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Another list of Somerset scheduled monuments at FLC
As you have previously commented on one or more of nominations of the lists of scheduled monuments in Somerset, I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at the List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset which is now nominated at Featured list candidates/List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset/archive1?&mdash; Rod talk 21:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801
The article Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre Lemonnier (anthropologist)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pierre Lemonnier (anthropologist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk) 04:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

The final FLC nom of a list of Scheduled monuments in Somerset
As you have kindly added comments to one or more of the FLC nominations of Scheduled monuments in Somerset I wanted to let you know that the final list, List of scheduled monuments in Mendip, is nomination for Featured List status at Featured list candidates/List of scheduled monuments in Mendip/archive1. If you had any comments that would be great.&mdash; Rod talk 20:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello from the team at Featured article review!


We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.

Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.

Thanks for your help! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 19:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801
The article Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ganteaume's expeditions of 1801 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 00:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bali Strait Incident
Harrias talk 19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Raid on Manila (1798)
I think footnote 27 is wrong. I don't have the book and don't know exactly what you intended. It seems to be part of footnote 28, and when I reformatted to SFN, I may have introduced an error. Please correct as necessary. Thanks. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, good job on catching that - it was my fault, a copy and paste error. I've fixed it now. Much appreciated--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I tidied the citations. Hope that you find SFn to your liking.  Very nice article.  Good job!  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 15:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * IMO, The hook needs to be clarified as to loss of life. Compare, "Cooke's opportunistic diversion had determined that the Spanish forces in the Philippines posed no immediate threat, although the mission had cost 18 lives."  16:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Those lives were lost in a shipwreck and an attack on Zamboanga after the raid on Manila. No lives were lost in the raid itself. I'll try and rephrase if you think its best?--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a little confusing, as it all appears in the same article. And the DYK powers that be get real picky.  Maybe put in the date of the raid?  Or an Alt hook about the false flag, impersonation, anti-Brit toasts, etc.  The story is rally intriguing and amusing, I think.  17:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, good point, I'll think again.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

GTG. We'll see. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 17:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This citation and the ISBN are inconsistent. Gardiner, Robert, ed (2001) [1998]. The Victory of Seapower. Caxton Editions. ISBN 1-84067-359-1.  The ISBN connects to Woodman, Richard. The Victory of Seapower: winning the Napoleonic War, 1806-1814. London: Caxton in association with the National Maritime Museum, 2001. Print.  What gives?  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 17:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've looked into it - Gardiner was the editor and he and Woodman were co-authors. I'll change the citation--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I tweaked it further.  Bon apetit!   <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 18:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Action of 28 February 1799
Hello, I completed a review of your nomination and think that your feedback could help with a few issues. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  02:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Action of 30 June 1798
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Nice article. Do you have access to any of the online newspaper archives? Should be plenty of material available. Mjroots (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I should, through my university. I hadn't considered looking there, but it might be interesting. I'll see what I can turn up. Thanks!--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795)
The article Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 05:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Mahé, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese, Soundings and Red flag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bali Strait Incident
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bali Strait Incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 19:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , I just wanted to touch base and let you know that I have completed reviews of both Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795) and Bali Strait Incident. They are both Good Article ready, but I had a few very minor suggestions for each. Once those are addressed, both are good for passage to Good Article status! It's been a privilege to review several of your recent articles, and I always look forward to seeing what you write next. -- West Virginian   (talk)  18:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Raid on Manila (1798)
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bali Strait Incident
The article Bali Strait Incident you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bali Strait Incident for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Mahé
The article Battle of Mahé you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Mahé for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bali Strait Incident
The article Bali Strait Incident you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bali Strait Incident for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

USS Essex in the East Indies Theatre of the French Revolutionary War
Here is a pretty extensive source detailing the frigate USS Essex's deployment in the East Indies, []. I also have a source that describes some details about a few engagements between American privateers and French privateers, which spurred the deployment of Essex. None are particularly notable in my own opinion except for the American ship Rebecca 's (16 guns) action with Jean Dutertre's brig Malartic (12 guns), where the Rebecca severely mauled the Malartic enabling it to be captured with ease by the HEIC ship Phoenix the next day on 10 November 1800.XavierGreen (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Macau Incident (1799)
Gatoclass (talk) 01:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Action of 28 February 1799
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capitulation of Saldanha Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capitulation of Saldanha Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capitulation of Saldanha Bay
The article Capitulation of Saldanha Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Capitulation of Saldanha Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 9 September 1796
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 9 September 1796 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Raid on Manila (1798)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Raid on Manila (1798) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Port Louis
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Port Louis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 9 September 1796
The article Action of 9 September 1796 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Action of 9 September 1796 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Port Louis
The article Battle of Port Louis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Port Louis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Capitulation of Saldanha Bay
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Raid on Manila (1798)
The article Raid on Manila (1798) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Raid on Manila (1798) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 30 June 1798
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 30 June 1798 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 28 February 1799
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 28 February 1799 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's featured article/August 20, 2015
A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? I took a guess on one thing: "a fourth was unable to close to within effective gun range, and later seized as it left the harbour." - Dank (push to talk) 00:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good, thanks for the heads up --Jackyd101 (talk) 00:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 28 February 1799
The article Action of 28 February 1799 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Action of 28 February 1799 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Action of 28 February 1799, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mast and Bulkhead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

New article
Hello there, I created this article Battle of Bishops Court‎ - just wondered if this was one that you wanted to create as well? Regards. Shire Lord (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 30 June 1798
The article Action of 30 June 1798 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Action of 30 June 1798 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars
The article East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:East Indies theatre of the French Revolutionary Wars for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Doubt
Hello, how is it all going? I hope everything's fine. First of all, I would like to thank you once again for the great original articles you have contributed to Wikipedia with. As you know, I have translated some of them into Spanish for our version of the Wikipedia. Currently, I am trying to translate "Action of 5 May 1794" and I found one problem. While adding the bibliography, I saw that you cited Gardiner's The Victory of Seapower. However, if I am not wrong, isn't that a book written by Woodman? Or maybe you referred to another of Gardiner's books... Sorry if I disturb you, but I would like to be sure which book it is. Thank you very much. Greetings, Rubpe19 14:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Rubpe, sections of the book were written by Woodman (most of it actually), but the volume was edited by Gardiner who is therefore given as the main name.--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know that. Thank you for answering so fast. Rubpe19 09:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem at all, happy new year (tomorrow)!--Jackyd101 (talk) 13:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * That is extremely kind of you thank you very much. I have taken a break from Wikipedia this year as I finish my PhD thesis, but I am planning a return in 2017 to continue work on this area. This encouragement is very welcome and appreciated, I am glad people are using it as a teaching resource.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Atlantic blockade in the French Revolutionary Wars
Template:Campaignbox Atlantic blockade in the French Revolutionary Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Thomas Crisp
Hi, we're looking to get Thomas Crisp on the main page...but there are just a couple of tags to deal with. I am not a milhist editor at all and was wondering if you had sources...cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi that's nice, thanks for getting in touch. I'm afraid I'm semi-retired from Wikipedia while I finish off my PhD, but I'll try and take a look at this at some point this week. My sources on this guy are in storage at the moment, but I'll see what I can do.--Jackyd101 (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks/much appreciated. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, haven't got to this yet - I'll see what I can do soon, --Jackyd101 (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Géza Gyóni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Géza Gyóni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Géza Gyóni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Jackyd101. I'm just posting to let you know that Order of battle in the Atlantic campaign of 1806 – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 4. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 23:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Guilden Morden boar & Tjele helmet fragment
Hi there, thanks again for taking the time to review my three nominations. Do you have any idea how to get the green "+" symbol to appear on the Guilden Morden boar and Tjele helmet fragment pages? I thought they might just appear with time, but it's been a few days and nothing has happened. --Usernameunique (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hmmm. It should have happened automatically via a bot. I did everything I was supposed to . . . if its not up by the weekend I'll raise it on the GA talk page. --Jackyd101 (talk) 10:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Sounds good, thanks! --Usernameunique (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of the Basque Roads
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Court-martial of James, Lord Gambier
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Action of 8 March 1795, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leghorn ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Action_of_8_March_1795 check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Action_of_8_March_1795?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Basque Roads
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of the Basque Roads you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves
{| style="border: 2px solid lightsteelblue; background-color: whitesmoke;"
 * rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:WikiChevronsOakLeaves.png|80px]]
 * rowspan="2" |
 * style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |&ensp;The WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves&ensp;
 * style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | In recognition of your extraordinary content work and your hundreds of GAN reviews, please accept the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves as a token of the project's appreciation. Thank you. Biblio (talk) 17:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | In recognition of your extraordinary content work and your hundreds of GAN reviews, please accept the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves as a token of the project's appreciation. Thank you. Biblio (talk) 17:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Basque Roads
The article Battle of the Basque Roads you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of the Basque Roads for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 00:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Les Sables-d'Olonne
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Les Sables-d'Olonne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Les Sables-d'Olonne
The article Battle of Les Sables-d'Olonne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Les Sables-d'Olonne for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 22 October 1793
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 22 October 1793 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Murder of Joey Fischer GA Review
Hello:

I am half way through a copy edit requested from the GOCE of this article you reviewed and approved for GA status. In my opinion, this article should have been failed immediately. Even a cursory look at the edits I have made make it abundantly clear that the article does not meet GA requirements that "the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct". I wanted to respectfully draw this to your attention. Regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Dear Twofingered Typist. Whilst I respect your opinion, I fundamentally and completely disagree with your assessment. I have written more than 140 FAs and GAs and reviewed more than 250; I know very well what the criteria require. They do not require excellence in prose, only that it is "clear and concise". When reviewing articles at GA, often the first place an article arrives for review and where they can, like this one, be waiting for up to six months, it is common to encounter younger, less-experienced editors, or those for whom English is a second-language. If I were to force these editors to conduct massive text-revisions at this stage, the likelihood is that they would be unable to complete them and many articles which are a bit rough but perfectly understandable would fail out of hand. The GA-process and possibly the wider Wikipedia project would lose many perfectly good trainee editors as a result.


 * I had no trouble following this article once a few simple clarifications were made, and thus judged that the editor had produced text which, while obviously inadequate for A-class or FA-class, was perfectly sufficient for GA. Your edits have substantially improved the tone of the article, but they have not fundamentally changed the nature of the information within, or my ability to comprehend it as a reader. If you feel strongly enough about it please do send it to Good article reassessment for wider opinion. Best --Jackyd101 (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi everyone. First off, thank you Twofingered Typist for taking this article. All of your updates are greatly appreciated. I recognize that my English is nowhere near perfect, and that's the main reason why I've never explored the idea of nominating my work to FA. I have my fair share of GAs and GARs, however. The reason why I decided to try out FA for Joey Fischer's article was because I consider it my best work in terms of research (I'm also planning to visit some of the sites in person next month so I can take pictures), but if editors think it's not ready, I'll gladly hold off from taking it there. I was thinking of reaching out to multiple editors who've promoted murder articles (i.e. Murder of Dwayne Jones, Murder of Julia Martha Thomas, Murder of Joanna Yeates) before nominating it for FA. Happy editing, MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 16:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Clearly we have a completely different understanding of the phrase "spelling and grammar are correct". So be it. I've spent 8 hours on it now and am happy to spend 4 more to finish it. By then it will meet my expectations of the prose quality of a GA article. Regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Good for you. --Jackyd101 (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)