User talk:JacoFromBedJet

Welcome!
Hello, JacoFromBedJet, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:JacoFromBedJet, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Waqar 💬 21:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JacoFromBedJet


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:JacoFromBedJet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Waqar 💬 21:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Waqar, it appears I made a few critical errors. I was under the impression that my draft had not been published, and only saved. However, it would appear that it must have been published as it was deleted. My account was deleted before I even worked on the page a second time. This action feels incredibly harsh considering no warning was given. The page was largely incomplete at time of deletion, actually only just started, and lacked large amounts of context and information. While incomplete, content on the page was entirely factual and unbiased. In addition, Wikipedia contains volumes of pages focused on other businesses that have been published for much longer than my own. Finally, I was unaware that my account's name was in violation of user guidelines. I hope you will take this into consideration. Should my account and page remain blocked and deleted, am I able to recover the content that I lost in the deletion? Thank you for your time JacoFromBedJet (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Euryalus (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Hi Euryalus, it appears I made a few critical errors. I was under the impression that my draft had not been published, and only saved. However, it would appear that it must have been published as it was deleted. My account was deleted before I even worked on the page a second time. This action feels incredibly harsh considering no warning was given. The page was largely incomplete at time of deletion, actually only just started, and lacked large amounts of context and information. While incomplete, content on the page was entirely factual and unbiased. This page is purely informational and is no more of an advertisement than the pages for Nike, Apple, or Amazon. In addition, Wikipedia contains volumes of pages focused on other businesses that have been published for much longer than my own. Finally, I was unaware that my account's name was in violation of user guidelines. I will happily change it to an acceptable one given the chance. I hope you will take this into consideration. Should my account and page remain blocked and deleted, am I able to recover the content that I lost in the deletion? JacoFromBedJet (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. Happy to provide you with a copy of the content, but need to ask what your association is with BedJet. Are you an employee there? Do you have any other close association with this business? If so, are you aware of Wikipedia's policies on conflicts of interest and (potentially) paid editing? Also worth noting that while the content of an article might be factual the article subject needs to have sufficient notability to justify a Wikipedia page. Notability is conferred by coverage in reliable secondary sources, which were not provided in the article you created. Responses welcome, and apologies for all the links to read. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * And per the below, apologies I misremembered a line in the username policy. Your username is technically fine as it is clear it refers to an individual and not a job title, or just to the company name itself (eg an account named "BedJet" or "CEOfromBedJet" would be prohibited, but "JacofromBedJet" is okay). Hope that makes sense, and no need to change your username. :) -- Euryalus (talk) 21:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * This company was also featured in an episode of the popular television series Shark Tank, which will be referenced in the article JacoFromBedJet (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not an employee, and have no close association with the business. My editing is unpaid by BedJet or otherwise. As stated previously, I hadn't yet completed the article but have several sources to confer notability including Business Insider, Forbes, and Wired. JacoFromBedJet (talk) 13:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

is closed. Obviously your account is not deleted and you responded here. Accounts are not deleted. Only spam -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)


 * This looks like a "person-at-company" type username, so not a username violation. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * yes you're correct, apologies for misremembering this. Issues remain re promotional editing and possible COI. Have referred to these in the comment above. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @EuryalusHi, I would like to request to be unbanned/unblocked. My content was not promotional in nature and my username is not in violation of policy. I hope this can be completed with expediency. JacoFromBedJet (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I was mislead by the phrasing "A tag has been placed on your user page, User:JacoFromBedJet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia" JacoFromBedJet (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. Unfortunately your only substantive edit does seem promotional. Your username is JacofromBedJet, and you created a draft for the BedJet business referenced solely to the BedJet website with emphasis on promotional phrasing like great commercial success and a true American startup ... full of bright-eyed inventors. Your UTRS appeal also begins with the sentence: "While creating a page on behalf of my company..., which makes clear that you have a direct link to the business you want to write about. On this basis I do not support an unblock of this account.


 * However, I won't be in any way offended if you'd like an independent administrator to consider this issue from scratch. The way to do that is by using the template as outlined in the box above. This will flag this talkpage for other administrators to give the thing a fresh look. Hope that's helpful, and all the best with that appeal if you choose to make it. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Promotional content deleted under WP:G11. In my UTRS decline, I gave instruction for requesting unblocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I would endorse unblocking if you agree to follow the process for creating a Draft via WP:AFC, using content cited to WP:reliable sources. Please note that WP:user page's are not for article creation. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I would like to be unblocked to correct my prior errors. I have no intention of generating promotional content and wish only to contribute on a notable topic.

You say you aren't associated with BedJet, but your username states otherwise. Please discuss this seeming contradiction. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The creation of this page has no affiliation with the company. I thought the username would be appropriate given the page topic I sought to create. If it satisfies you I would happily change the username. JacoFromBedJet (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)